田口法测定酒精滥用阳性。

Tolga Taner, Jiju Antony
{"title":"田口法测定酒精滥用阳性。","authors":"Tolga Taner,&nbsp;Jiju Antony","doi":"10.1108/09526860510588115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aims to establish the critical score and screening accuracy of the CAGE Questionnaire in three treatment settings--primary health care, walk-in (triage) clinic and the emergency room.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Taguchi methods are applied to three screens of the CAGE questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity data of three CAGE screens by leveling factor (p'), signal-to-noise ratios (S/N, SS/N) and their dependent relation resulted in critical CAGE scores of 1, 1 and 2; and high screening accuracy levels of 98.44, 97.20 and 94.92 percent, respectively. The illustrated method yielded excellent (> or = 95 percent) screening accuracy values for primary health care, emergency room and walk-in clinic patients.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>To reduce misclassification rates of alcohol abuse, screening systems should concentrate first on developing ways to standardize protocols. Further work is needed to establish high screening accuracy in other clinical settings, and particularly in those at risk of alcohol abuse in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"18 2-3","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860510588115","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining positivity of alcohol abuse by Taguchi methods.\",\"authors\":\"Tolga Taner,&nbsp;Jiju Antony\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09526860510588115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aims to establish the critical score and screening accuracy of the CAGE Questionnaire in three treatment settings--primary health care, walk-in (triage) clinic and the emergency room.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Taguchi methods are applied to three screens of the CAGE questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity data of three CAGE screens by leveling factor (p'), signal-to-noise ratios (S/N, SS/N) and their dependent relation resulted in critical CAGE scores of 1, 1 and 2; and high screening accuracy levels of 98.44, 97.20 and 94.92 percent, respectively. The illustrated method yielded excellent (> or = 95 percent) screening accuracy values for primary health care, emergency room and walk-in clinic patients.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>To reduce misclassification rates of alcohol abuse, screening systems should concentrate first on developing ways to standardize protocols. Further work is needed to establish high screening accuracy in other clinical settings, and particularly in those at risk of alcohol abuse in the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"volume\":\"18 2-3\",\"pages\":\"83-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860510588115\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510588115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510588115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:旨在建立CAGE问卷在初级卫生保健、免预约(分诊)诊所和急诊室三种治疗环境中的关键评分和筛查准确性。设计/方法/方法:田口方法应用于CAGE问卷的三个屏幕。结果:通过均衡因子(p′)、信噪比(S/N、SS/N)及其依赖关系分析三种CAGE筛查的敏感性和特异性数据,得出CAGE的临界评分分别为1、1和2分;筛查准确率分别为98.44%、97.20%和94.92%。所示的方法对初级卫生保健、急诊室和无预约诊所患者的筛查准确度值极佳(>或= 95%)。原创性/价值:为了减少酒精滥用的错误分类率,筛选系统应首先集中精力开发标准化方案的方法。在其他临床环境中,特别是在普通人群中有酗酒风险的人群中,需要进一步的工作来建立高筛查准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining positivity of alcohol abuse by Taguchi methods.

Purpose: Aims to establish the critical score and screening accuracy of the CAGE Questionnaire in three treatment settings--primary health care, walk-in (triage) clinic and the emergency room.

Design/methodology/approach: Taguchi methods are applied to three screens of the CAGE questionnaire.

Findings: Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity data of three CAGE screens by leveling factor (p'), signal-to-noise ratios (S/N, SS/N) and their dependent relation resulted in critical CAGE scores of 1, 1 and 2; and high screening accuracy levels of 98.44, 97.20 and 94.92 percent, respectively. The illustrated method yielded excellent (> or = 95 percent) screening accuracy values for primary health care, emergency room and walk-in clinic patients.

Originality/value: To reduce misclassification rates of alcohol abuse, screening systems should concentrate first on developing ways to standardize protocols. Further work is needed to establish high screening accuracy in other clinical settings, and particularly in those at risk of alcohol abuse in the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信