共识方法:临床推理与临床研究之间的桥梁?

Hugh Cross
{"title":"共识方法:临床推理与临床研究之间的桥梁?","authors":"Hugh Cross","doi":"10.1489/1544-581X(2005)73[28:CMABBC]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-Based Practice does head the \"hierarchy of evidence\" upon which developments in clinical practice should be based. There are, however, situations where evidence is either unavailable, unclear, or results between studies are at variance. Consensus is a reliable contingency, and approaches to reaching consensus have acceptable construct validity (Nominal Group Technique, Delphi, and Consensus Development Conference). Consensus is reached when: (i) the method of investigation tightly controls communication to reduce the obscuring \"noise\" of divergent discussion; (ii) statistical measures of agreement or dissent screen out the bias that would otherwise be produced by the dictate of vociferous minorities or coalitions that may represent vested interests; (iii) all participants contribute equally to the product of the investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":"73 1","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus methods: a bridge between clinical reasoning and clinical research?\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1489/1544-581X(2005)73[28:CMABBC]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence-Based Practice does head the \\\"hierarchy of evidence\\\" upon which developments in clinical practice should be based. There are, however, situations where evidence is either unavailable, unclear, or results between studies are at variance. Consensus is a reliable contingency, and approaches to reaching consensus have acceptable construct validity (Nominal Group Technique, Delphi, and Consensus Development Conference). Consensus is reached when: (i) the method of investigation tightly controls communication to reduce the obscuring \\\"noise\\\" of divergent discussion; (ii) statistical measures of agreement or dissent screen out the bias that would otherwise be produced by the dictate of vociferous minorities or coalitions that may represent vested interests; (iii) all participants contribute equally to the product of the investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"28-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1489/1544-581X(2005)73[28:CMABBC]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1489/1544-581X(2005)73[28:CMABBC]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

循证实践确实引领了“证据层次”,临床实践的发展应基于此。然而,在某些情况下,证据要么是不可获得的,要么是不清楚的,或者研究之间的结果是不一致的。共识是一种可靠的偶然性,达成共识的方法具有可接受的结构效度(名义群体技术、德尔菲和共识发展会议)。达成共识的条件是:(1)调查方法严格控制沟通,减少分歧讨论的模糊“噪音”;(ii)对同意或异议的统计措施,可以筛除因可能代表既得利益的吵闹的少数群体或联盟的命令而产生的偏见;(iii)所有参与者对调查结果的贡献相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus methods: a bridge between clinical reasoning and clinical research?

Evidence-Based Practice does head the "hierarchy of evidence" upon which developments in clinical practice should be based. There are, however, situations where evidence is either unavailable, unclear, or results between studies are at variance. Consensus is a reliable contingency, and approaches to reaching consensus have acceptable construct validity (Nominal Group Technique, Delphi, and Consensus Development Conference). Consensus is reached when: (i) the method of investigation tightly controls communication to reduce the obscuring "noise" of divergent discussion; (ii) statistical measures of agreement or dissent screen out the bias that would otherwise be produced by the dictate of vociferous minorities or coalitions that may represent vested interests; (iii) all participants contribute equally to the product of the investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信