肺炎实践有指南吗?对社区获得性肺炎管理最佳实践的干预措施和障碍的系统回顾。

Scot H Simpson, Thomas J Marrie, Sumit R Majumdar
{"title":"肺炎实践有指南吗?对社区获得性肺炎管理最佳实践的干预措施和障碍的系统回顾。","authors":"Scot H Simpson,&nbsp;Thomas J Marrie,&nbsp;Sumit R Majumdar","doi":"10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful guideline implementation programs need to understand local barriers, incorporate multiple component interventions, and proceed within a framework of continuous quality improvement. We found few intervention studies to improve CAP guideline adherence and no controlled studies that used certain practice changes strategies that have proven effective for other conditions, such as face-to-face educational outreach, use of local opinion leaders, and individualized audit with peer-comparison feedback. Future studies in CAP management need to use rigorous study designs, use multiple evidence-based strategies to change practice, and convincingly demonstrate to front-line health care providers that the suggested interventions are safe and improve patient outcomes. Paper does not change practice, and the creation and mailing out of a practice guideline for the treatment of CAP is only the first necessary step in translating good evidence into everyday clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":79530,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do guidelines guide pneumonia practice? A systematic review of interventions and barriers to best practice in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Scot H Simpson,&nbsp;Thomas J Marrie,&nbsp;Sumit R Majumdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Successful guideline implementation programs need to understand local barriers, incorporate multiple component interventions, and proceed within a framework of continuous quality improvement. We found few intervention studies to improve CAP guideline adherence and no controlled studies that used certain practice changes strategies that have proven effective for other conditions, such as face-to-face educational outreach, use of local opinion leaders, and individualized audit with peer-comparison feedback. Future studies in CAP management need to use rigorous study designs, use multiple evidence-based strategies to change practice, and convincingly demonstrate to front-line health care providers that the suggested interventions are safe and improve patient outcomes. Paper does not change practice, and the creation and mailing out of a practice guideline for the treatment of CAP is only the first necessary step in translating good evidence into everyday clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2004.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

成功的指南实施计划需要了解当地的障碍,纳入多种干预措施,并在持续质量改进的框架内进行。我们发现很少有干预研究可以提高CAP指南的依从性,也没有对照研究使用某些实践改变策略,这些策略已被证明对其他情况有效,如面对面的教育推广,使用当地意见领袖,以及具有同行比较反馈的个性化审计。未来对CAP管理的研究需要使用严格的研究设计,使用多种循证策略来改变实践,并令人信服地向一线卫生保健提供者证明所建议的干预措施是安全的,并能改善患者的预后。论文不能改变实践,创建和邮寄治疗CAP的实践指南只是将良好证据转化为日常临床实践的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do guidelines guide pneumonia practice? A systematic review of interventions and barriers to best practice in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.

Successful guideline implementation programs need to understand local barriers, incorporate multiple component interventions, and proceed within a framework of continuous quality improvement. We found few intervention studies to improve CAP guideline adherence and no controlled studies that used certain practice changes strategies that have proven effective for other conditions, such as face-to-face educational outreach, use of local opinion leaders, and individualized audit with peer-comparison feedback. Future studies in CAP management need to use rigorous study designs, use multiple evidence-based strategies to change practice, and convincingly demonstrate to front-line health care providers that the suggested interventions are safe and improve patient outcomes. Paper does not change practice, and the creation and mailing out of a practice guideline for the treatment of CAP is only the first necessary step in translating good evidence into everyday clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信