在干细胞研究的背景下定义人类体外胚胎的新伦理标准。

Duke law and technology review Pub Date : 2002-12-10
Sina A Muscati
{"title":"在干细胞研究的背景下定义人类体外胚胎的新伦理标准。","authors":"Sina A Muscati","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This iBrief discusses some of the social, ethical and legal considerations surrounding the use of unimplanted, in vitro embryos in stem cell research. It proposes that a new ethical standard be elucidated for these embryos. The iBrief gives an overview of two proposals for such a standard at opposite ends of the spectrum: treating the in vitro embryo as a legal person versus treating it as mere property. It argues against both approaches. The former can have undesirable social implications including undue interference with female reproductive autonomy, while the latter would objectify potential human life and reproductive potential. The iBrief proposes an intermediate approach that treats the embryo as a special entity. It warns against a model whereby the respect accorded to embryos is made dependent on the attainment of various qualitative or developmental criteria. The complexities surrounding human life, it argues, are too uncertain. What is certain is the embryo's unique potential for human life, at any developmental stage. This, the iBrief proposes, should be the sole criterion for an embryo's special status, a status that should be confined within constitutional limits.</p>","PeriodicalId":87176,"journal":{"name":"Duke law and technology review","volume":" ","pages":"E1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining a new ethical standard for human in vitro embryos in the context of stem cell research.\",\"authors\":\"Sina A Muscati\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This iBrief discusses some of the social, ethical and legal considerations surrounding the use of unimplanted, in vitro embryos in stem cell research. It proposes that a new ethical standard be elucidated for these embryos. The iBrief gives an overview of two proposals for such a standard at opposite ends of the spectrum: treating the in vitro embryo as a legal person versus treating it as mere property. It argues against both approaches. The former can have undesirable social implications including undue interference with female reproductive autonomy, while the latter would objectify potential human life and reproductive potential. The iBrief proposes an intermediate approach that treats the embryo as a special entity. It warns against a model whereby the respect accorded to embryos is made dependent on the attainment of various qualitative or developmental criteria. The complexities surrounding human life, it argues, are too uncertain. What is certain is the embryo's unique potential for human life, at any developmental stage. This, the iBrief proposes, should be the sole criterion for an embryo's special status, a status that should be confined within constitutional limits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duke law and technology review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duke law and technology review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke law and technology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了围绕在干细胞研究中使用未植入的体外胚胎的一些社会、伦理和法律考虑。提出了一种新的胚胎伦理标准。摘要概述了这一标准在光谱两端的两种建议:将体外胚胎视为法人与将其视为纯粹财产。它反对这两种方法。前者可能产生不良的社会影响,包括对女性生殖自主的不当干涉,而后者则将潜在的人类生命和生殖潜力物化。摘要提出了一种中间方法,将胚胎视为一个特殊的实体。它警告不要采用一种模式,即对胚胎的尊重取决于是否达到各种质量或发育标准。它认为,人类生活的复杂性太不确定了。可以肯定的是,在任何发育阶段,胚胎对人类生命都具有独特的潜力。摘要建议,这应该是胚胎特殊地位的唯一标准,这种地位应该被限制在宪法的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining a new ethical standard for human in vitro embryos in the context of stem cell research.

This iBrief discusses some of the social, ethical and legal considerations surrounding the use of unimplanted, in vitro embryos in stem cell research. It proposes that a new ethical standard be elucidated for these embryos. The iBrief gives an overview of two proposals for such a standard at opposite ends of the spectrum: treating the in vitro embryo as a legal person versus treating it as mere property. It argues against both approaches. The former can have undesirable social implications including undue interference with female reproductive autonomy, while the latter would objectify potential human life and reproductive potential. The iBrief proposes an intermediate approach that treats the embryo as a special entity. It warns against a model whereby the respect accorded to embryos is made dependent on the attainment of various qualitative or developmental criteria. The complexities surrounding human life, it argues, are too uncertain. What is certain is the embryo's unique potential for human life, at any developmental stage. This, the iBrief proposes, should be the sole criterion for an embryo's special status, a status that should be confined within constitutional limits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信