A J Kandathil, R Kannangai, S David, G Nithyanandam, S Solomon, P Balakrishnan, O C Abraham, S Subramanian, P Rupali, V P Verghese, S Pulimood, G Sridharan
{"title":"微毛细管细胞术与流式细胞术检测CD4+和CD8+ t细胞的比较。","authors":"A J Kandathil, R Kannangai, S David, G Nithyanandam, S Solomon, P Balakrishnan, O C Abraham, S Subramanian, P Rupali, V P Verghese, S Pulimood, G Sridharan","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An alternative technology for the estimation of T cells based on a microcapillary technique (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) was compared to FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Samples from 51 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 21 healthy individuals were tested. The correlation (r) of the two systems for CD4(+) T cells was 0.994, and the coefficient of variation was 6.5%, establishing equable performance between the two technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 8","pages":"1006-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Microcapillary Cytometry Technology and Flow Cytometry for CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Estimation.\",\"authors\":\"A J Kandathil, R Kannangai, S David, G Nithyanandam, S Solomon, P Balakrishnan, O C Abraham, S Subramanian, P Rupali, V P Verghese, S Pulimood, G Sridharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An alternative technology for the estimation of T cells based on a microcapillary technique (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) was compared to FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Samples from 51 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 21 healthy individuals were tested. The correlation (r) of the two systems for CD4(+) T cells was 0.994, and the coefficient of variation was 6.5%, establishing equable performance between the two technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"1006-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.1006-1009.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
将一种基于微毛细管技术的T细胞估计替代技术(Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA)与FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA)进行比较。对51例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者和21例健康人的样本进行了检测。两种技术检测CD4(+) T细胞的相关系数(r)为0.994,变异系数为6.5%,两种技术表现均衡。
Comparison of Microcapillary Cytometry Technology and Flow Cytometry for CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Estimation.
An alternative technology for the estimation of T cells based on a microcapillary technique (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA) was compared to FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Samples from 51 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 21 healthy individuals were tested. The correlation (r) of the two systems for CD4(+) T cells was 0.994, and the coefficient of variation was 6.5%, establishing equable performance between the two technologies.