输精管结扎男性不孕不育的最佳治疗:辅助生殖还是输精管结扎逆转?

Revista do Hospital das Clinicas Pub Date : 2004-10-01 Epub Date: 2004-10-29 DOI:10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016
Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto, Antônio Marmo Lucon, Bernardo Passos Sobreiro, Eleonora Bedin Pasqualotto, Sami Arap
{"title":"输精管结扎男性不孕不育的最佳治疗:辅助生殖还是输精管结扎逆转?","authors":"Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto,&nbsp;Antônio Marmo Lucon,&nbsp;Bernardo Passos Sobreiro,&nbsp;Eleonora Bedin Pasqualotto,&nbsp;Sami Arap","doi":"10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":76453,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","volume":"59 5","pages":"312-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?\",\"authors\":\"Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto,&nbsp;Antônio Marmo Lucon,&nbsp;Bernardo Passos Sobreiro,&nbsp;Eleonora Bedin Pasqualotto,&nbsp;Sami Arap\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"312-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2004/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

对于既往输精管切除术的男性,如果梗阻间隔小于15年,且不存在女性生育风险因素,显微手术生殖道重建比体外受精取精和卵浆内单精子注射更具成本效益。如果发现附睾梗阻或存在高龄女性,则应个体化决定采用显微手术重建或体外受精取精和胞浆内单精子注射。当需要体外受精的女性因素存在时,或者当精子提取和卵浆内单精子注射的成功率超过手术治疗的成功率时,首选体外受精和卵浆内单精子注射的精子提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?

In men with prior vasectomy, microsurgical reconstruction of the reproductive tract is more cost-effective than sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection if the obstructive interval is less than 15 years and no female fertility risk factors are present. If epididymal obstruction is detected or advanced female age is present, the decision to use either microsurgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection should be individualized. Sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection is preferred to surgical treatment when female factors requiring in vitro fertilization are present or when the chance for success with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection exceeds the chance for success with surgical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信