【CT与钡灌肠检查诊断胃癌腹膜转移的比较研究】。

Satoshi Nozu, Tetsuo Nakajima, Toshihiro Ichikawa, Katsuhiko Okayasu
{"title":"【CT与钡灌肠检查诊断胃癌腹膜转移的比较研究】。","authors":"Satoshi Nozu,&nbsp;Tetsuo Nakajima,&nbsp;Toshihiro Ichikawa,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Okayasu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of CT and barium enema examination in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Peritoneal metastases were pathologically confirmed in nine patients with gastric carcinoma who had had abdominal CT and barium enema examinations prior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Five patients were reported to have colonic wall rigidity on preoperative barium enema examination. Review of the images indicated that six cases showed rigidity. On the other hand, no CT findings suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were reported in eight patients without ascites. No patients were indicated to have intraperitoneal nodules. For the retrospective evaluation, we changed the diagnostic procedure: the CT window setting was changed in wide window width (from 250 Hounsfield units (HU) to 400HU)and low window level (50-60HU to 0 HU), and reading mode was changed to a cine paging mode with a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) instead of hard-copy review. It followed that intraperitoneal nodules suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were detected in eight patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On conventional image reading, barium enema examination is of greater assistance than CT examination for detecting peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma. However, the new CT reading method with PACS is more sensitive than barium enema examination for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19251,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica","volume":"64 5","pages":"284-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A comparative study of CT and barium enema examination in diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma].\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Nozu,&nbsp;Tetsuo Nakajima,&nbsp;Toshihiro Ichikawa,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Okayasu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of CT and barium enema examination in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Peritoneal metastases were pathologically confirmed in nine patients with gastric carcinoma who had had abdominal CT and barium enema examinations prior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Five patients were reported to have colonic wall rigidity on preoperative barium enema examination. Review of the images indicated that six cases showed rigidity. On the other hand, no CT findings suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were reported in eight patients without ascites. No patients were indicated to have intraperitoneal nodules. For the retrospective evaluation, we changed the diagnostic procedure: the CT window setting was changed in wide window width (from 250 Hounsfield units (HU) to 400HU)and low window level (50-60HU to 0 HU), and reading mode was changed to a cine paging mode with a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) instead of hard-copy review. It followed that intraperitoneal nodules suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were detected in eight patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On conventional image reading, barium enema examination is of greater assistance than CT examination for detecting peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma. However, the new CT reading method with PACS is more sensitive than barium enema examination for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\"64 5\",\"pages\":\"284-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较CT与钡灌肠检查对胃癌腹膜转移的诊断价值。资料:9例术前行腹部CT及钡剂灌肠检查的胃癌患者经病理证实有腹膜转移。方法与结果:报告5例患者术前钡剂灌肠检查发现结肠壁僵直。复查图像显示6例表现为僵直。另一方面,8例无腹水的患者未见提示腹膜转移的CT表现。没有患者显示有腹膜内结节。为了进行回顾性评价,我们改变了诊断程序:将CT窗口设置改为宽窗口宽度(从250 Hounsfield单位(HU)改为400HU)和低窗口电平(从50-60HU改为0HU),并将阅读模式改为带有图片存档和通信系统(PACS)的电影分页模式,而不是硬拷贝审查。在8例患者中发现提示腹膜转移的腹膜内结节。结论:在常规影像学上,钡剂灌肠检查对胃癌腹膜转移的诊断价值高于CT检查。然而,新的CT阅读方法与PACS诊断腹膜转移比钡灌肠检查更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A comparative study of CT and barium enema examination in diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma].

Objective: To compare the results of CT and barium enema examination in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma.

Materials: Peritoneal metastases were pathologically confirmed in nine patients with gastric carcinoma who had had abdominal CT and barium enema examinations prior to surgery.

Methods and results: Five patients were reported to have colonic wall rigidity on preoperative barium enema examination. Review of the images indicated that six cases showed rigidity. On the other hand, no CT findings suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were reported in eight patients without ascites. No patients were indicated to have intraperitoneal nodules. For the retrospective evaluation, we changed the diagnostic procedure: the CT window setting was changed in wide window width (from 250 Hounsfield units (HU) to 400HU)and low window level (50-60HU to 0 HU), and reading mode was changed to a cine paging mode with a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) instead of hard-copy review. It followed that intraperitoneal nodules suggestive of peritoneal metastasis were detected in eight patients.

Conclusion: On conventional image reading, barium enema examination is of greater assistance than CT examination for detecting peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma. However, the new CT reading method with PACS is more sensitive than barium enema examination for diagnosing peritoneal metastasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信