运动测试中心电图r波变化的价值:运动前与运动后测量。

Cardiovascular diseases Pub Date : 1981-09-01
Dennis W. Rowe, Alonzo Autrey, Carlos M. De Castro, Efrain Garcia, Robert J. Hall
{"title":"运动测试中心电图r波变化的价值:运动前与运动后测量。","authors":"Dennis W. Rowe,&nbsp;Alonzo Autrey,&nbsp;Carlos M. De Castro,&nbsp;Efrain Garcia,&nbsp;Robert J. Hall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the usefulness of R-wave amplitude changes during exercise testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and to understand the discrepancies that have been described in the literature regarding their value, we studied two groups of patients by means of electrocardiographic (EKG) treadmill testing and coronary arteriography. Group I was composed of 149 patients who were studied prospectively. The specificity of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to immediately postexercise (SRV(5)) was 81%, but that of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to peak exercise (URV(5)) was 46%. A group of 156 patients (Group II) evaluated retrospectively showed a high specificity for the SRV(5) (84%) and poor specificity for the URV(5) (39%). The sensitivity of the SRV(5) was 38% in Group I and 42% in Group II. Therefore, if measured during the immediate postexercise period and not at peak exercise, changes in R-wave amplitude may be of value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by electrocardiographic exercise testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":84396,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diseases","volume":"8 3","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC287950/pdf/cardiodis00003-0036.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of electrocardiographic R-wave changes in exercise testing: Preexercise versus postexercise measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis W. Rowe,&nbsp;Alonzo Autrey,&nbsp;Carlos M. De Castro,&nbsp;Efrain Garcia,&nbsp;Robert J. Hall\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine the usefulness of R-wave amplitude changes during exercise testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and to understand the discrepancies that have been described in the literature regarding their value, we studied two groups of patients by means of electrocardiographic (EKG) treadmill testing and coronary arteriography. Group I was composed of 149 patients who were studied prospectively. The specificity of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to immediately postexercise (SRV(5)) was 81%, but that of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to peak exercise (URV(5)) was 46%. A group of 156 patients (Group II) evaluated retrospectively showed a high specificity for the SRV(5) (84%) and poor specificity for the URV(5) (39%). The sensitivity of the SRV(5) was 38% in Group I and 42% in Group II. Therefore, if measured during the immediate postexercise period and not at peak exercise, changes in R-wave amplitude may be of value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by electrocardiographic exercise testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"333-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC287950/pdf/cardiodis00003-0036.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定运动试验中r波振幅变化对诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的有用性,并了解文献中关于其价值的差异,我们通过心电图(EKG)跑步机试验和冠状动脉造影对两组患者进行了研究。第一组由149例患者组成,前瞻性研究。从运动前到运动后立即测量的r波变化(SRV(5))的特异性为81%,但从运动前到运动峰值(URV(5))测量的r波变化的特异性为46%。回顾性评估的156例患者(II组)显示SRV的高特异性(5例)(84%)和URV的低特异性(5例)(39%)。第一组SRV(5)的敏感性为38%,第二组为42%。因此,如果在运动后立即测量,而不是在运动高峰时测量,则r波振幅的变化可能对心电图运动试验诊断冠状动脉疾病有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of electrocardiographic R-wave changes in exercise testing: Preexercise versus postexercise measurements.

To determine the usefulness of R-wave amplitude changes during exercise testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and to understand the discrepancies that have been described in the literature regarding their value, we studied two groups of patients by means of electrocardiographic (EKG) treadmill testing and coronary arteriography. Group I was composed of 149 patients who were studied prospectively. The specificity of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to immediately postexercise (SRV(5)) was 81%, but that of R-wave changes measured from preexercise to peak exercise (URV(5)) was 46%. A group of 156 patients (Group II) evaluated retrospectively showed a high specificity for the SRV(5) (84%) and poor specificity for the URV(5) (39%). The sensitivity of the SRV(5) was 38% in Group I and 42% in Group II. Therefore, if measured during the immediate postexercise period and not at peak exercise, changes in R-wave amplitude may be of value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by electrocardiographic exercise testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信