尸体试验标本中骨矿物质含量的测定。

Stefan M Duma, Joel D Stitzel, Jeff R Crandall, Liam P Ryan
{"title":"尸体试验标本中骨矿物质含量的测定。","authors":"Stefan M Duma,&nbsp;Joel D Stitzel,&nbsp;Jeff R Crandall,&nbsp;Liam P Ryan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to determine the best method for presenting the bone mineral content of cadaveric test specimens. A total of 59 bone samples were taken from the humeri, radii, and ulnae of 14 female cadavers. For each sample, the bone mineral content was determined with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner, and the ash-weight ratio was calculated manually. A linear regression analysis was performed to compare the ash-weight ratio to the 3 methods for reporting bone mineral content as measured by a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner: by bone mineral content divided by sample length (in g/cm), by projected area (in g/cm2), or by sample volume (in g/cm3). The analysis revealed that the ash-weight ratio correlates best with the volumetric representation. Based on these data, a volumetric representation is suggested as the best representation of bone mineralization, due to its correlation with ash-weight ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":79349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association","volume":"11 2","pages":"80-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of bone mineral content in cadaveric test specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan M Duma,&nbsp;Joel D Stitzel,&nbsp;Jeff R Crandall,&nbsp;Liam P Ryan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was designed to determine the best method for presenting the bone mineral content of cadaveric test specimens. A total of 59 bone samples were taken from the humeri, radii, and ulnae of 14 female cadavers. For each sample, the bone mineral content was determined with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner, and the ash-weight ratio was calculated manually. A linear regression analysis was performed to compare the ash-weight ratio to the 3 methods for reporting bone mineral content as measured by a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner: by bone mineral content divided by sample length (in g/cm), by projected area (in g/cm2), or by sample volume (in g/cm3). The analysis revealed that the ash-weight ratio correlates best with the volumetric representation. Based on these data, a volumetric representation is suggested as the best representation of bone mineralization, due to its correlation with ash-weight ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"80-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定呈现尸体标本骨矿物质含量的最佳方法。从14具女性尸体的肱骨、桡骨和尺骨上共采集了59个骨样本。对每个样品,用双能x射线吸收扫描仪测定骨矿物质含量,并人工计算灰分重量比。进行线性回归分析,比较灰重比与三种报告骨矿物质含量的方法(双能x射线吸收仪扫描仪测量):骨矿物质含量除以样品长度(g/cm),投影面积(g/cm2)或样本量(g/cm3)。分析表明,灰分重量比与体积表征关系最密切。基于这些数据,体积表征被认为是骨矿化的最佳表征,因为它与灰分重量比相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of bone mineral content in cadaveric test specimens.

This study was designed to determine the best method for presenting the bone mineral content of cadaveric test specimens. A total of 59 bone samples were taken from the humeri, radii, and ulnae of 14 female cadavers. For each sample, the bone mineral content was determined with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner, and the ash-weight ratio was calculated manually. A linear regression analysis was performed to compare the ash-weight ratio to the 3 methods for reporting bone mineral content as measured by a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner: by bone mineral content divided by sample length (in g/cm), by projected area (in g/cm2), or by sample volume (in g/cm3). The analysis revealed that the ash-weight ratio correlates best with the volumetric representation. Based on these data, a volumetric representation is suggested as the best representation of bone mineralization, due to its correlation with ash-weight ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信