[用客观的计算机辅助粘弹性测量评估疤痕发展]。

H O Rennekampff, J Rabbels, M Pfau, H E Schaller
{"title":"[用客观的计算机辅助粘弹性测量评估疤痕发展]。","authors":"H O Rennekampff,&nbsp;J Rabbels,&nbsp;M Pfau,&nbsp;H E Schaller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective study we compared the subjective scar assessment by the Vancouver Scar Scale with an objective viscoelastic measurement. Donor sites from the thigh primarily dressed with vaseline gauze (F), biobrane or occlusive dressing(O) were evaluated 0.5 years postoperatively by VSS and with the Cutometer (Courage and Khazaka). VSS of donor sites was 2.74 +/- 0.91 (F), 4.25 +/- 0.77 (B) and 2.57 +/- 0.72(O) (mean +/- sem). All ratings were significant compared to normal mirror-sided skin. Viscoelastic measurements by the Cutometer were near normal compared to uninjured skin. No correlation was found between subscale VSS pliabilty rating and Cutometer readings.</p>","PeriodicalId":81771,"journal":{"name":"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","volume":"119 ","pages":"749-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluating scar development with objective computer-assisted viscoelastic measurement].\",\"authors\":\"H O Rennekampff,&nbsp;J Rabbels,&nbsp;M Pfau,&nbsp;H E Schaller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a prospective study we compared the subjective scar assessment by the Vancouver Scar Scale with an objective viscoelastic measurement. Donor sites from the thigh primarily dressed with vaseline gauze (F), biobrane or occlusive dressing(O) were evaluated 0.5 years postoperatively by VSS and with the Cutometer (Courage and Khazaka). VSS of donor sites was 2.74 +/- 0.91 (F), 4.25 +/- 0.77 (B) and 2.57 +/- 0.72(O) (mean +/- sem). All ratings were significant compared to normal mirror-sided skin. Viscoelastic measurements by the Cutometer were near normal compared to uninjured skin. No correlation was found between subscale VSS pliabilty rating and Cutometer readings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"749-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,我们比较了温哥华疤痕量表的主观疤痕评估和客观粘弹性测量。用凡士林纱布(F)、生物膜或闭塞敷料(O)包扎的大腿供体部位在术后0.5年通过VSS和Cutometer (Courage和Khazaka)进行评估。供体部位的VSS分别为2.74 +/- 0.91 (F)、4.25 +/- 0.77 (B)和2.57 +/- 0.72(O)(平均+/- sem)。与正常的镜面皮肤相比,所有评分都很显著。与未受伤的皮肤相比,Cutometer的粘弹性测量接近正常。分量表VSS柔韧性等级与自动仪表读数之间没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluating scar development with objective computer-assisted viscoelastic measurement].

In a prospective study we compared the subjective scar assessment by the Vancouver Scar Scale with an objective viscoelastic measurement. Donor sites from the thigh primarily dressed with vaseline gauze (F), biobrane or occlusive dressing(O) were evaluated 0.5 years postoperatively by VSS and with the Cutometer (Courage and Khazaka). VSS of donor sites was 2.74 +/- 0.91 (F), 4.25 +/- 0.77 (B) and 2.57 +/- 0.72(O) (mean +/- sem). All ratings were significant compared to normal mirror-sided skin. Viscoelastic measurements by the Cutometer were near normal compared to uninjured skin. No correlation was found between subscale VSS pliabilty rating and Cutometer readings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信