tcu200与孕激素宫内节育器的比较。

Contraceptive delivery systems Pub Date : 1983-04-01
P Lavin, C Bravo, C Waszak
{"title":"tcu200与孕激素宫内节育器的比较。","authors":"P Lavin,&nbsp;C Bravo,&nbsp;C Waszak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insertions of the T Cu 200 and the Progestasert IUDs in a total of 400 postpartum women were compared. Insertions were carried out within 10 minutes of delivery, either manually or with an inserter. There was a significant difference in the 6 and 12 month expulsion rates (P0.05) between the 2 groups, but no differences were found related to type of insertion. 12 month expulsion rates for the T Cu hand and inserter groups were 9.0 and 8.1, respectively, and 35.8 and 35.2 for the Progestasert hand and inserted groups, respectively. Overall, significantly fewer Progestasert users reported dysmenorrhea at follow-up and the specific 12 month dysmenorrhea rate was significantly lower for the Progestasert users than for the T Cu users. More women in the Progestasert groups reported intermenstrual spotting and bleeding, but specific 12 month rates of intermenstrual pain, spotting, and bleeding showed no differences between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":84493,"journal":{"name":"Contraceptive delivery systems","volume":"4 2","pages":"143-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of T Cu 200 and Progestasert IUDs.\",\"authors\":\"P Lavin,&nbsp;C Bravo,&nbsp;C Waszak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insertions of the T Cu 200 and the Progestasert IUDs in a total of 400 postpartum women were compared. Insertions were carried out within 10 minutes of delivery, either manually or with an inserter. There was a significant difference in the 6 and 12 month expulsion rates (P0.05) between the 2 groups, but no differences were found related to type of insertion. 12 month expulsion rates for the T Cu hand and inserter groups were 9.0 and 8.1, respectively, and 35.8 and 35.2 for the Progestasert hand and inserted groups, respectively. Overall, significantly fewer Progestasert users reported dysmenorrhea at follow-up and the specific 12 month dysmenorrhea rate was significantly lower for the Progestasert users than for the T Cu users. More women in the Progestasert groups reported intermenstrual spotting and bleeding, but specific 12 month rates of intermenstrual pain, spotting, and bleeding showed no differences between the groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraceptive delivery systems\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"143-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraceptive delivery systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraceptive delivery systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较400例产后妇女使用tcu200和孕激素宫内节育器的情况。在分娩10分钟内进行插入,无论是手动插入还是使用插入器插入。两组患者6个月和12个月的拔管率比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),但不同插管方式间无统计学差异。T - Cu手组和插入组的12个月驱逐率分别为9.0和8.1,孕激素手组和插入组的12个月驱逐率分别为35.8和35.2。总的来说,在随访中,孕激素使用者报告痛经的人数明显减少,孕激素使用者的特定12个月痛经率明显低于T - Cu使用者。孕激素组中有更多的妇女报告经期出血和点滴出血,但具体12个月的经期疼痛、点滴和出血发生率在两组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of T Cu 200 and Progestasert IUDs.

Insertions of the T Cu 200 and the Progestasert IUDs in a total of 400 postpartum women were compared. Insertions were carried out within 10 minutes of delivery, either manually or with an inserter. There was a significant difference in the 6 and 12 month expulsion rates (P0.05) between the 2 groups, but no differences were found related to type of insertion. 12 month expulsion rates for the T Cu hand and inserter groups were 9.0 and 8.1, respectively, and 35.8 and 35.2 for the Progestasert hand and inserted groups, respectively. Overall, significantly fewer Progestasert users reported dysmenorrhea at follow-up and the specific 12 month dysmenorrhea rate was significantly lower for the Progestasert users than for the T Cu users. More women in the Progestasert groups reported intermenstrual spotting and bleeding, but specific 12 month rates of intermenstrual pain, spotting, and bleeding showed no differences between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信