杂志扫描。

J Wardrope, R Russell
{"title":"杂志扫描。","authors":"J Wardrope, R Russell","doi":"10.1136/emj.17.5.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke remains a controversial area. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study (NINDS) trial reported improved long term neurological function when patients were treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator (iv tPA) within three hours of symptom onset. This benefit was set against an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Further studies have produced similar results, although others have not shown any benefit. Doubts remain regarding the safety and eYcacy in routine clinical use outside specialist centres. The debate continues in this contentious area and two contrasting papers show diVerent positions and results. It would be a useful postgraduate educational exercise to compare and contrast these studies in detail and try to explain the very diVerent findings in these trials. What are the main conclusions that you draw from this issue? Prize for the best critique that is e-mailed to the Journal scan editor by 22 September 2000.","PeriodicalId":73580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.5.368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journal scan.\",\"authors\":\"J Wardrope, R Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emj.17.5.368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke remains a controversial area. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study (NINDS) trial reported improved long term neurological function when patients were treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator (iv tPA) within three hours of symptom onset. This benefit was set against an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Further studies have produced similar results, although others have not shown any benefit. Doubts remain regarding the safety and eYcacy in routine clinical use outside specialist centres. The debate continues in this contentious area and two contrasting papers show diVerent positions and results. It would be a useful postgraduate educational exercise to compare and contrast these studies in detail and try to explain the very diVerent findings in these trials. What are the main conclusions that you draw from this issue? Prize for the best critique that is e-mailed to the Journal scan editor by 22 September 2000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.5.368\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.5.368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.5.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Journal scan.
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke remains a controversial area. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke study (NINDS) trial reported improved long term neurological function when patients were treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator (iv tPA) within three hours of symptom onset. This benefit was set against an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Further studies have produced similar results, although others have not shown any benefit. Doubts remain regarding the safety and eYcacy in routine clinical use outside specialist centres. The debate continues in this contentious area and two contrasting papers show diVerent positions and results. It would be a useful postgraduate educational exercise to compare and contrast these studies in detail and try to explain the very diVerent findings in these trials. What are the main conclusions that you draw from this issue? Prize for the best critique that is e-mailed to the Journal scan editor by 22 September 2000.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信