如果审计委员会来找你怎么办?

E S Searle
{"title":"如果审计委员会来找你怎么办?","authors":"E S Searle","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Readers will be familiar with high profile media items, like the Audit Commission investigating national public institutions, and publicising rigorous critiques of their ‘value for money’. Family planning (FP) services may be interested to learn that the Audit Commission also perform ‘district audits’ (nothing to do with ‘clinical audit’) and that these can analyse broader concerns to do with quality of patient care and acceptability of services, not just efficiency. ‘Out of the blue’ our service was the focus of such a district audit conducted over just 3 weeks. We were asked what areas, apart from ‘value for money’, we would like investigated. We were keen to measure if our efforts of collaboration with Primary Care and other agencies had been effective. We learned that there is a national system (DATIS) to compare each FP service's expenditure per thousand patients. We also learned that being the subject of such an investigation need not be a threatening experience, and can be an opportunity to review quality of care and demonstrate our cost effectiveness. This account is the report of the district audit team of our service and our attempts at collaboration.","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 3","pages":"152-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194607","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What if the audit commission visited you?\",\"authors\":\"E S Searle\",\"doi\":\"10.1783/147118900101194607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Readers will be familiar with high profile media items, like the Audit Commission investigating national public institutions, and publicising rigorous critiques of their ‘value for money’. Family planning (FP) services may be interested to learn that the Audit Commission also perform ‘district audits’ (nothing to do with ‘clinical audit’) and that these can analyse broader concerns to do with quality of patient care and acceptability of services, not just efficiency. ‘Out of the blue’ our service was the focus of such a district audit conducted over just 3 weeks. We were asked what areas, apart from ‘value for money’, we would like investigated. We were keen to measure if our efforts of collaboration with Primary Care and other agencies had been effective. We learned that there is a national system (DATIS) to compare each FP service's expenditure per thousand patients. We also learned that being the subject of such an investigation need not be a threatening experience, and can be an opportunity to review quality of care and demonstrate our cost effectiveness. This account is the report of the district audit team of our service and our attempts at collaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of family planning\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"152-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194607\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of family planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of family planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

读者应该熟悉一些高调的媒体报道,比如审计委员会对国家公共机构的调查,以及对这些机构“物有所值”的严厉批评。计划生育服务部门可能有兴趣了解到,审计署也进行“地区审计”(与“临床审计”无关),这些审计可以分析更广泛的问题,包括病人护理的质量和服务的可接受性,而不仅仅是效率。在短短3周的时间里,我们的服务成为了地区审计的重点。我们被问到,除了“物有所值”之外,我们还希望调查哪些领域。我们渴望衡量我们与初级保健和其他机构合作的努力是否有效。我们了解到,有一个国家系统(DATIS)来比较每个计划生育服务每千名患者的支出。我们还了解到,成为这种调查的对象不一定是一种威胁的经历,而是一个审查护理质量和证明我们的成本效益的机会。这个账户是我们服务的地区审计组的报告和我们合作的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What if the audit commission visited you?
Readers will be familiar with high profile media items, like the Audit Commission investigating national public institutions, and publicising rigorous critiques of their ‘value for money’. Family planning (FP) services may be interested to learn that the Audit Commission also perform ‘district audits’ (nothing to do with ‘clinical audit’) and that these can analyse broader concerns to do with quality of patient care and acceptability of services, not just efficiency. ‘Out of the blue’ our service was the focus of such a district audit conducted over just 3 weeks. We were asked what areas, apart from ‘value for money’, we would like investigated. We were keen to measure if our efforts of collaboration with Primary Care and other agencies had been effective. We learned that there is a national system (DATIS) to compare each FP service's expenditure per thousand patients. We also learned that being the subject of such an investigation need not be a threatening experience, and can be an opportunity to review quality of care and demonstrate our cost effectiveness. This account is the report of the district audit team of our service and our attempts at collaboration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信