报告卡对病人和医生打分吗?

Healthcare benchmarks Pub Date : 1999-09-01
{"title":"报告卡对病人和医生打分吗?","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Key points. A study sponsored by U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research showed that physician report cards (physician profiles) for diabetes were unable to reliably detect true practice differences among doctors at three types of medical practices studied. The difficulty in using outcomes to evaluate physician performance in this study was due, in large part, to the relatively small number of diabetics managed by each doctor. A major problem with the current method of profiling individual doctors is the process can backfire if linked to powerful incentives not to have patients whose conditions are hard to manage and/or incur high costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":79946,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare benchmarks","volume":"6 9","pages":"102-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do report cards score with patients and doctors?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Key points. A study sponsored by U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research showed that physician report cards (physician profiles) for diabetes were unable to reliably detect true practice differences among doctors at three types of medical practices studied. The difficulty in using outcomes to evaluate physician performance in this study was due, in large part, to the relatively small number of diabetics managed by each doctor. A major problem with the current method of profiling individual doctors is the process can backfire if linked to powerful incentives not to have patients whose conditions are hard to manage and/or incur high costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare benchmarks\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"102-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare benchmarks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare benchmarks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要点。一项由美国卫生保健政策和研究机构赞助的研究表明,糖尿病的医生报告卡(医生简介)无法可靠地检测出医生在三种被研究的医疗实践中的真实差异。在这项研究中,使用结果来评估医生表现的困难在很大程度上是由于每个医生管理的糖尿病患者数量相对较少。目前对个别医生进行分析的一个主要问题是,如果与不让病情难以控制和/或成本高昂的病人就诊的强烈动机联系在一起,这个过程可能会适得其反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do report cards score with patients and doctors?

Key points. A study sponsored by U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research showed that physician report cards (physician profiles) for diabetes were unable to reliably detect true practice differences among doctors at three types of medical practices studied. The difficulty in using outcomes to evaluate physician performance in this study was due, in large part, to the relatively small number of diabetics managed by each doctor. A major problem with the current method of profiling individual doctors is the process can backfire if linked to powerful incentives not to have patients whose conditions are hard to manage and/or incur high costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信