保护举报人:防止在卫生保健机构虐待病人的报告后进行报复。

K Burkin, B H Kleiner
{"title":"保护举报人:防止在卫生保健机构虐待病人的报告后进行报复。","authors":"K Burkin,&nbsp;B H Kleiner","doi":"10.1108/09552069810207088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health-care providers throughout the United States face litigation and the threat of litigation on a daily basis due to claims of patient abuse. Hidden within the costs associated with defending patient abuse claims are the wrongful termination filings made by employees who claim they were retaliated against for their whistleblowing activity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why an employer would resort to retaliatory acts in the shadow of a patient abuse filing and to discuss what steps are currently taken to prove and investigate the validity of a retaliation claim. Included within the body of this paper are court decisions on the topics of whistleblowing protection and violation of public policy. These examples are illustrated so that recommendations can be provided that assist the employer in avoiding a wrongful discharge claim and help to conclude that retaliation against the whistleblower is a costly mistake even with the employment at-will principle as a defense.</p>","PeriodicalId":79611,"journal":{"name":"Health manpower management","volume":"24 2-3","pages":"119-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09552069810207088","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting the whistleblower: preventing retaliation following a report of patient abuse in health-care institutions.\",\"authors\":\"K Burkin,&nbsp;B H Kleiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09552069810207088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health-care providers throughout the United States face litigation and the threat of litigation on a daily basis due to claims of patient abuse. Hidden within the costs associated with defending patient abuse claims are the wrongful termination filings made by employees who claim they were retaliated against for their whistleblowing activity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why an employer would resort to retaliatory acts in the shadow of a patient abuse filing and to discuss what steps are currently taken to prove and investigate the validity of a retaliation claim. Included within the body of this paper are court decisions on the topics of whistleblowing protection and violation of public policy. These examples are illustrated so that recommendations can be provided that assist the employer in avoiding a wrongful discharge claim and help to conclude that retaliation against the whistleblower is a costly mistake even with the employment at-will principle as a defense.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health manpower management\",\"volume\":\"24 2-3\",\"pages\":\"119-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09552069810207088\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health manpower management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09552069810207088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health manpower management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09552069810207088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美国各地的保健服务提供者每天都面临因虐待病人的索赔而引起的诉讼和诉讼威胁。在为患者虐待索赔辩护的相关费用中,隐藏着员工提出的错误解雇申请,他们声称自己因举报活动而受到报复。本文的目的是证明为什么雇主会在病人虐待档案的阴影下采取报复行为,并讨论目前采取哪些步骤来证明和调查报复索赔的有效性。包括在这篇论文的主体是法院的决定对举报保护和违反公共政策的主题。这些例子是为了提供建议,以帮助雇主避免错误解雇索赔,并有助于得出这样的结论:即使以随意雇用原则作为辩护,对举报人的报复也是一个代价高昂的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protecting the whistleblower: preventing retaliation following a report of patient abuse in health-care institutions.

Health-care providers throughout the United States face litigation and the threat of litigation on a daily basis due to claims of patient abuse. Hidden within the costs associated with defending patient abuse claims are the wrongful termination filings made by employees who claim they were retaliated against for their whistleblowing activity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why an employer would resort to retaliatory acts in the shadow of a patient abuse filing and to discuss what steps are currently taken to prove and investigate the validity of a retaliation claim. Included within the body of this paper are court decisions on the topics of whistleblowing protection and violation of public policy. These examples are illustrated so that recommendations can be provided that assist the employer in avoiding a wrongful discharge claim and help to conclude that retaliation against the whistleblower is a costly mistake even with the employment at-will principle as a defense.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信