Peter W. Hom, Rodger W. Griffeth, C.Louise Sellaro
{"title":"mobley(1977)员工离职模型的有效性","authors":"Peter W. Hom, Rodger W. Griffeth, C.Louise Sellaro","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unlike earlier tests of an oversimplified version of this model, the validity of W. Mobley's (1977, <em>Journal of Applied Psychology</em>, <strong>62,</strong> 237–240) original turnover model was fully investigated. Constructs that were neglected in prior studies were assessed and previously examined constructs were operationalized with more reliable measures. Measures of all constructs in Mobley's model were obtained from a survey of 192 hospital employees. Turnover data were collected a year following survey administration. Following the theoretical causal ordering of Mobley's constructs, each construct was regressed on all causally prior constructs. In general, each construct was accurately predicted by the linear combination of predictors representing its causal determinants. In the majority of instances, the best predictor of a model construct was the construct's immediate causal antecedent. Further, an alternative model was evaluated and compared with Mobley's model using path analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 141-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1","citationCount":"400","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The validity of mobley's (1977) model of employee turnover\",\"authors\":\"Peter W. Hom, Rodger W. Griffeth, C.Louise Sellaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unlike earlier tests of an oversimplified version of this model, the validity of W. Mobley's (1977, <em>Journal of Applied Psychology</em>, <strong>62,</strong> 237–240) original turnover model was fully investigated. Constructs that were neglected in prior studies were assessed and previously examined constructs were operationalized with more reliable measures. Measures of all constructs in Mobley's model were obtained from a survey of 192 hospital employees. Turnover data were collected a year following survey administration. Following the theoretical causal ordering of Mobley's constructs, each construct was regressed on all causally prior constructs. In general, each construct was accurately predicted by the linear combination of predictors representing its causal determinants. In the majority of instances, the best predictor of a model construct was the construct's immediate causal antecedent. Further, an alternative model was evaluated and compared with Mobley's model using path analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1\",\"citationCount\":\"400\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507384900011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507384900011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 400
摘要
与早期对该模型的过度简化版本的测试不同,W. Mobley (1977, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240)的原始周转模型的有效性得到了充分的调查。在先前的研究中被忽视的构念被评估,先前检查的构念被更可靠的措施操作。Mobley模型中所有构式的测量均来自对192名医院员工的调查。营业额数据是在调查进行一年后收集的。根据Mobley构念的理论因果顺序,每个构念对所有因果先验构念进行回归。一般来说,每个结构都是通过代表其因果决定因素的预测因子的线性组合来准确预测的。在大多数情况下,模型构念的最佳预测因子是构念的直接因果前词。此外,利用通径分析对备选模型进行了评估,并与Mobley模型进行了比较。
The validity of mobley's (1977) model of employee turnover
Unlike earlier tests of an oversimplified version of this model, the validity of W. Mobley's (1977, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240) original turnover model was fully investigated. Constructs that were neglected in prior studies were assessed and previously examined constructs were operationalized with more reliable measures. Measures of all constructs in Mobley's model were obtained from a survey of 192 hospital employees. Turnover data were collected a year following survey administration. Following the theoretical causal ordering of Mobley's constructs, each construct was regressed on all causally prior constructs. In general, each construct was accurately predicted by the linear combination of predictors representing its causal determinants. In the majority of instances, the best predictor of a model construct was the construct's immediate causal antecedent. Further, an alternative model was evaluated and compared with Mobley's model using path analysis.