草药——表明立场。草药制剂的有效性和实用性]。

Fortschritte der Medizin Pub Date : 1999-03-10
C Kori-Lindner
{"title":"草药——表明立场。草药制剂的有效性和实用性]。","authors":"C Kori-Lindner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the discussion on the elimination of certain groups of drugs and disorders from the list of obligatory services to be remunerated by state health insurances, vague, undefined terms such as \"controversial\" are being applied to phytopharmaceuticals and their fields of application. This may be traced back to an ignorance and global rejection of available scientific documentation. The rational background of modern phytopharmaceuticals are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73051,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Medizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Herbal medicine--taking a position. Effectiveness and usefulness of herbal preparations].\",\"authors\":\"C Kori-Lindner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the discussion on the elimination of certain groups of drugs and disorders from the list of obligatory services to be remunerated by state health insurances, vague, undefined terms such as \\\"controversial\\\" are being applied to phytopharmaceuticals and their fields of application. This may be traced back to an ignorance and global rejection of available scientific documentation. The rational background of modern phytopharmaceuticals are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte der Medizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte der Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在讨论从国家健康保险支付的义务服务清单中删除某些类别的药物和疾病时,对植物药物及其应用领域使用了诸如"有争议的"等含糊不清的术语。这可以追溯到对现有科学文献的无知和全球拒绝。讨论了现代植物药产生的理性背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Herbal medicine--taking a position. Effectiveness and usefulness of herbal preparations].

During the discussion on the elimination of certain groups of drugs and disorders from the list of obligatory services to be remunerated by state health insurances, vague, undefined terms such as "controversial" are being applied to phytopharmaceuticals and their fields of application. This may be traced back to an ignorance and global rejection of available scientific documentation. The rational background of modern phytopharmaceuticals are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信