可卡因依赖的日间治疗与住院治疗:实验比较。

R Schneider, C Mittelmeier, D Gadish
{"title":"可卡因依赖的日间治疗与住院治疗:实验比较。","authors":"R Schneider,&nbsp;C Mittelmeier,&nbsp;D Gadish","doi":"10.1007/BF02519114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to explore the question of whether day treatment is a viable alternative to inpatient treatment for cocaine-dependent patients. Inpatient subjects were compared with day treatment subjects in a randomized, prospective study design. Treatment outcome was evaluated at three and six months posttreatment. At three months posttreatment, the inpatient group had a statistically significant higher rate of total abstinence than the day-treatment group, but the difference at six months was not statistically significant. The two groups also were statistically comparable at six months posttreatment in terms of ¿current¿ abstinence and in terms of other measures. Average costs for day-treatment subjects was 48-61% of the cost for inpatient subjects. The results of this study support the use of day treatment as a clinically and economically effective alternative to inpatient treatment for many cocaine-dependent patients, especially when steps are taken to minimize drop out.</p>","PeriodicalId":73827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health administration","volume":"23 2","pages":"234-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02519114","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day versus inpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: an experimental comparison.\",\"authors\":\"R Schneider,&nbsp;C Mittelmeier,&nbsp;D Gadish\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02519114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was designed to explore the question of whether day treatment is a viable alternative to inpatient treatment for cocaine-dependent patients. Inpatient subjects were compared with day treatment subjects in a randomized, prospective study design. Treatment outcome was evaluated at three and six months posttreatment. At three months posttreatment, the inpatient group had a statistically significant higher rate of total abstinence than the day-treatment group, but the difference at six months was not statistically significant. The two groups also were statistically comparable at six months posttreatment in terms of ¿current¿ abstinence and in terms of other measures. Average costs for day-treatment subjects was 48-61% of the cost for inpatient subjects. The results of this study support the use of day treatment as a clinically and economically effective alternative to inpatient treatment for many cocaine-dependent patients, especially when steps are taken to minimize drop out.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mental health administration\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"234-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02519114\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mental health administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本研究旨在探讨日间治疗是否可行替代住院治疗可卡因依赖患者的问题。在一项随机、前瞻性研究设计中,住院患者与日间治疗患者进行比较。在治疗后3个月和6个月评估治疗结果。在治疗后3个月,住院组的总戒断率高于日间治疗组,但在6个月时差异无统计学意义。两组在治疗后6个月的“当前”戒断和其他措施方面也具有统计学上的可比性。日间治疗组的平均费用为住院组的48-61%。本研究的结果支持使用日间治疗作为临床上和经济上有效的替代住院治疗的许多可卡因依赖患者,特别是当采取措施尽量减少退出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Day versus inpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: an experimental comparison.

This study was designed to explore the question of whether day treatment is a viable alternative to inpatient treatment for cocaine-dependent patients. Inpatient subjects were compared with day treatment subjects in a randomized, prospective study design. Treatment outcome was evaluated at three and six months posttreatment. At three months posttreatment, the inpatient group had a statistically significant higher rate of total abstinence than the day-treatment group, but the difference at six months was not statistically significant. The two groups also were statistically comparable at six months posttreatment in terms of ¿current¿ abstinence and in terms of other measures. Average costs for day-treatment subjects was 48-61% of the cost for inpatient subjects. The results of this study support the use of day treatment as a clinically and economically effective alternative to inpatient treatment for many cocaine-dependent patients, especially when steps are taken to minimize drop out.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信