建立药物使用问卷的同时效度:方法学考虑。

Health values Pub Date : 1990-11-01
P D Sarvela
{"title":"建立药物使用问卷的同时效度:方法学考虑。","authors":"P D Sarvela","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent call for comprehensive drug education programs has provided a multitude of opportunities for health education specialists. Unfortunately, not all drug education programs are effective. Because of their lack of effectiveness, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation of existing programs. In order to conduct high quality evaluations, valid data collection procedures must be used. Probably the most common method of collecting data in drug use studies is the self-report questionnaire. One method of establishing the validity of these questionnaires is through urinalysis-based concurrent validity studies. Despite results similar to laboratory tests, investigators may have increased confidence in the results obtained from their questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":79617,"journal":{"name":"Health values","volume":"14 6","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing drug use questionnaire concurrent validity: methodological considerations.\",\"authors\":\"P D Sarvela\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent call for comprehensive drug education programs has provided a multitude of opportunities for health education specialists. Unfortunately, not all drug education programs are effective. Because of their lack of effectiveness, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation of existing programs. In order to conduct high quality evaluations, valid data collection procedures must be used. Probably the most common method of collecting data in drug use studies is the self-report questionnaire. One method of establishing the validity of these questionnaires is through urinalysis-based concurrent validity studies. Despite results similar to laboratory tests, investigators may have increased confidence in the results obtained from their questionnaires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health values\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"48-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近呼吁全面的药物教育计划为健康教育专家提供了大量的机会。不幸的是,并不是所有的毒品教育项目都有效。由于缺乏有效性,有必要对现有方案进行全面评估。为了进行高质量的评估,必须使用有效的数据收集程序。在药物使用研究中收集数据的最常用方法可能是自我报告问卷。建立这些问卷效度的一种方法是通过基于尿液分析的并发效度研究。尽管结果与实验室测试相似,但调查人员可能对从问卷中获得的结果更有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing drug use questionnaire concurrent validity: methodological considerations.

The recent call for comprehensive drug education programs has provided a multitude of opportunities for health education specialists. Unfortunately, not all drug education programs are effective. Because of their lack of effectiveness, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation of existing programs. In order to conduct high quality evaluations, valid data collection procedures must be used. Probably the most common method of collecting data in drug use studies is the self-report questionnaire. One method of establishing the validity of these questionnaires is through urinalysis-based concurrent validity studies. Despite results similar to laboratory tests, investigators may have increased confidence in the results obtained from their questionnaires.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信