L Freak, D Simon, A Kinsella, C McCollum, J Walsh, C Lane
{"title":"腿部溃疡护理:成本效益审计。","authors":"L Freak, D Simon, A Kinsella, C McCollum, J Walsh, C Lane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to establish an audit mechanism to determine the cost and effectiveness of leg ulcer care across two Health Authorities. Following identification of all patients with active ulcers over a two-month period, leg ulcer treatment, costs and outcome were prospectively audited over three months. We found that leg ulcer care is currently expensive and appears to be largely ineffective, especially when compared to the community clinic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"27 4","pages":"133-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leg ulcer care: an audit of cost-effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"L Freak, D Simon, A Kinsella, C McCollum, J Walsh, C Lane\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our objective was to establish an audit mechanism to determine the cost and effectiveness of leg ulcer care across two Health Authorities. Following identification of all patients with active ulcers over a two-month period, leg ulcer treatment, costs and outcome were prospectively audited over three months. We found that leg ulcer care is currently expensive and appears to be largely ineffective, especially when compared to the community clinic approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"133-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Our objective was to establish an audit mechanism to determine the cost and effectiveness of leg ulcer care across two Health Authorities. Following identification of all patients with active ulcers over a two-month period, leg ulcer treatment, costs and outcome were prospectively audited over three months. We found that leg ulcer care is currently expensive and appears to be largely ineffective, especially when compared to the community clinic approach.