超声在评价胆囊碎石术中的价值。

S H Lee, F P McGrath, J Zhou, H J Burhenne
{"title":"超声在评价胆囊碎石术中的价值。","authors":"S H Lee,&nbsp;F P McGrath,&nbsp;J Zhou,&nbsp;H J Burhenne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the reliability of ultrasound in measuring a minimum stone fragment burden we implanted radiolucent human gallstone fragments measuring from less than 1 mm up to 4 mm in size into the gallbladders of 12 domestic piglets. Forty-eight hours later the fragments in each animal were assessed by a qualified radiologist using two different ultrasound machines in a randomized blinded fashion. With regard to size estimation using a 5 MHz sector scanner, in two out of 12 examinations there was an overestimation of fragment size such that in a clinical setting an unneccessary repeat lithotripsy session would have been requested. A 5 MHz linear array transducer was of sufficient reliability in all size estimations not to have resulted in such a request. No gallbladder was falsely declared fragment free. There were nonshadowing fragments present in five of 12 examinations using both transducers. Clumping of small fragments less than or equal to 3 mm was present in two examinations. We recommend that a second ultrasound examination is performed when the presence of clumping is suspected and also when a fragment-free gallbladder is initially diagnosed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80212,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","volume":"3 4","pages":"319-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of sonography in the assessment of cholecystolithotripsy.\",\"authors\":\"S H Lee,&nbsp;F P McGrath,&nbsp;J Zhou,&nbsp;H J Burhenne\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the reliability of ultrasound in measuring a minimum stone fragment burden we implanted radiolucent human gallstone fragments measuring from less than 1 mm up to 4 mm in size into the gallbladders of 12 domestic piglets. Forty-eight hours later the fragments in each animal were assessed by a qualified radiologist using two different ultrasound machines in a randomized blinded fashion. With regard to size estimation using a 5 MHz sector scanner, in two out of 12 examinations there was an overestimation of fragment size such that in a clinical setting an unneccessary repeat lithotripsy session would have been requested. A 5 MHz linear array transducer was of sufficient reliability in all size estimations not to have resulted in such a request. No gallbladder was falsely declared fragment free. There were nonshadowing fragments present in five of 12 examinations using both transducers. Clumping of small fragments less than or equal to 3 mm was present in two examinations. We recommend that a second ultrasound examination is performed when the presence of clumping is suspected and also when a fragment-free gallbladder is initially diagnosed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"319-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估超声测量最小结石碎片负荷的可靠性,我们将大小从小于1毫米到4毫米的透光人胆结石碎片植入12只家养仔猪的胆囊。48小时后,每只动物的碎片由一位合格的放射科医生以随机盲法的方式使用两台不同的超声波仪进行评估。关于使用5兆赫扇区扫描仪的大小估计,在12次检查中有两次对碎片大小估计过高,因此在临床环境中会要求进行不必要的重复碎石检查。5mhz线性阵列换能器在所有尺寸估计中都具有足够的可靠性,不会导致这样的要求。没有胆囊被错误地宣布为无碎片。在使用这两种传感器的12次检查中,有5次出现无影片段。在两次检查中发现小于或等于3mm的小碎片结块。我们建议,当怀疑存在结块时,以及当最初诊断为无碎片胆囊时,应进行第二次超声检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of sonography in the assessment of cholecystolithotripsy.

To assess the reliability of ultrasound in measuring a minimum stone fragment burden we implanted radiolucent human gallstone fragments measuring from less than 1 mm up to 4 mm in size into the gallbladders of 12 domestic piglets. Forty-eight hours later the fragments in each animal were assessed by a qualified radiologist using two different ultrasound machines in a randomized blinded fashion. With regard to size estimation using a 5 MHz sector scanner, in two out of 12 examinations there was an overestimation of fragment size such that in a clinical setting an unneccessary repeat lithotripsy session would have been requested. A 5 MHz linear array transducer was of sufficient reliability in all size estimations not to have resulted in such a request. No gallbladder was falsely declared fragment free. There were nonshadowing fragments present in five of 12 examinations using both transducers. Clumping of small fragments less than or equal to 3 mm was present in two examinations. We recommend that a second ultrasound examination is performed when the presence of clumping is suspected and also when a fragment-free gallbladder is initially diagnosed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信