{"title":"膝关节疾病的调查和治疗:关节镜和磁共振成像的适应症和成本比较。","authors":"N Birch, D Powles, H Dorrell, P Brooks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results of a year-long prospective audit of all arthroscopies of the knee in one NHS Trust hospital indicate that selective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would be cost-effective in up to 40% of patients. However, to achieve such savings, at least 14% of patients who would otherwise need diagnostic arthroscopy would need to be excluded from surgery, the cost of MRI must be low, and the success rate of interpreting the scans should be known.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"26 2","pages":"50-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The investigation and treatment of disorders of the knee: indications and a cost-comparison of arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"N Birch, D Powles, H Dorrell, P Brooks\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Results of a year-long prospective audit of all arthroscopies of the knee in one NHS Trust hospital indicate that selective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would be cost-effective in up to 40% of patients. However, to achieve such savings, at least 14% of patients who would otherwise need diagnostic arthroscopy would need to be excluded from surgery, the cost of MRI must be low, and the success rate of interpreting the scans should be known.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health trends\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"50-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The investigation and treatment of disorders of the knee: indications and a cost-comparison of arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.
Results of a year-long prospective audit of all arthroscopies of the knee in one NHS Trust hospital indicate that selective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would be cost-effective in up to 40% of patients. However, to achieve such savings, at least 14% of patients who would otherwise need diagnostic arthroscopy would need to be excluded from surgery, the cost of MRI must be low, and the success rate of interpreting the scans should be known.