同意回避共识。

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1994-09-01
{"title":"同意回避共识。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A problem area certain to become a tough nut to crack in years to come is the extension of patient rights and autonomy to a more stringent level within the informed consent process in situations covering education, research, and epidemiology. Recent events and reports indicate at least an acknowledgment of some specific issues that need attention, as the following articles show.</p>","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"10 5","pages":"5-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consent evades consensus.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A problem area certain to become a tough nut to crack in years to come is the extension of patient rights and autonomy to a more stringent level within the informed consent process in situations covering education, research, and epidemiology. Recent events and reports indicate at least an acknowledgment of some specific issues that need attention, as the following articles show.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"5-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在教育、研究和流行病学等情况下,将患者的权利和自主权扩大到更严格的知情同意程序,这一问题在未来几年肯定会成为一个棘手的问题。最近的事件和报告表明,至少承认了一些需要注意的具体问题,如下文所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consent evades consensus.

A problem area certain to become a tough nut to crack in years to come is the extension of patient rights and autonomy to a more stringent level within the informed consent process in situations covering education, research, and epidemiology. Recent events and reports indicate at least an acknowledgment of some specific issues that need attention, as the following articles show.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信