照顾垂死的人。研究寻找人道的方式退出治疗。

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1994-07-01
{"title":"照顾垂死的人。研究寻找人道的方式退出治疗。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Applying the principles of decision making to end-of-life situations has been discussed at length in the medical ethics literature, but published accounts of actual experiences encountered when life-sustaining interventions are withdrawn have been limited. Once the decision is made to withdraw treatment and the goal of care shifts from cure to palliation, attention must be given to the clinical and ethical processes involved in extricating patients from their high-tech dependencies. The following articles summarize the work of several groups that are trying to define what ought to be done on behalf of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"10 4","pages":"10-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care of the dying. Studies look for humane ways of withdrawing treatment.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Applying the principles of decision making to end-of-life situations has been discussed at length in the medical ethics literature, but published accounts of actual experiences encountered when life-sustaining interventions are withdrawn have been limited. Once the decision is made to withdraw treatment and the goal of care shifts from cure to palliation, attention must be given to the clinical and ethical processes involved in extricating patients from their high-tech dependencies. The following articles summarize the work of several groups that are trying to define what ought to be done on behalf of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"10-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学伦理学文献详细讨论了将决策原则应用于生命结束时的情况,但发表的关于撤回维持生命干预措施时遇到的实际经验的描述有限。一旦决定停止治疗,护理目标从治愈转向缓和,就必须注意将患者从对高科技的依赖中解脱出来所涉及的临床和伦理过程。下面的文章总结了几个小组的工作,他们试图确定应该为这些病人做些什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care of the dying. Studies look for humane ways of withdrawing treatment.

Applying the principles of decision making to end-of-life situations has been discussed at length in the medical ethics literature, but published accounts of actual experiences encountered when life-sustaining interventions are withdrawn have been limited. Once the decision is made to withdraw treatment and the goal of care shifts from cure to palliation, attention must be given to the clinical and ethical processes involved in extricating patients from their high-tech dependencies. The following articles summarize the work of several groups that are trying to define what ought to be done on behalf of these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信