{"title":"结果研究:高期望，低收益?","authors":"M Stano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bulk of the nation's health services research has been redirected toward patient outcomes research conducted by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. But those expecting dramatic changes from the agency's work are likely be disappointed. One reason is the tendency to seize upon clever new theories as solutions to intricate problems, such as the inflated expectation that managed care will reap huge cost-savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of American health policy","volume":"4 2","pages":"50-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes research: high hopes, low yield?\",\"authors\":\"M Stano\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The bulk of the nation's health services research has been redirected toward patient outcomes research conducted by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. But those expecting dramatic changes from the agency's work are likely be disappointed. One reason is the tendency to seize upon clever new theories as solutions to intricate problems, such as the inflated expectation that managed care will reap huge cost-savings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of American health policy\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"50-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of American health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of American health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
美国卫生保健政策与研究机构(U.S. Agency for health Care Policy and research)进行的病人结果研究，已成为美国卫生保健服务研究的主要方向。但那些期待该机构工作发生巨大变化的人可能要失望了。原因之一是人们倾向于利用聪明的新理论来解决复杂的问题，比如对管理式医疗将节省大量成本的过高期望。
The bulk of the nation's health services research has been redirected toward patient outcomes research conducted by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. But those expecting dramatic changes from the agency's work are likely be disappointed. One reason is the tendency to seize upon clever new theories as solutions to intricate problems, such as the inflated expectation that managed care will reap huge cost-savings.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
