协助自杀。Kevorkian式的辩论模糊了司法法和立法法之间的界限。

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1994-01-01

{"title":"协助自杀。Kevorkian式的辩论模糊了司法法和立法法之间的界限。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staying current with the day-to-day drama surrounding Jack Kevorkian is nearly impossible for a bimonthly newsletter, but several significant events are worth exploring--rulings on the constitutionality of Michigan's law barring suicide assistance, the impact of the 20th Kevorkian-assisted suicide of a physician, and the public's response to the book Final Exit.","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assisted suicide. Kevorkian debate blurs the border between judicial and legislative law.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Staying current with the day-to-day drama surrounding Jack Kevorkian is nearly impossible for a bimonthly newsletter, but several significant events are worth exploring--rulings on the constitutionality of Michigan's law barring suicide assistance, the impact of the 20th Kevorkian-assisted suicide of a physician, and the public's response to the book Final Exit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对于一份双月刊的时事通讯来说，了解杰克·凯沃基安的日常生活几乎是不可能的，但有几个重大事件值得探讨——密歇根州禁止协助自杀的法律是否符合宪法，凯沃基安协助医生自杀的第20起案件的影响，以及公众对《最后的出路》一书的反应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Assisted suicide. Kevorkian debate blurs the border between judicial and legislative law.

Staying current with the day-to-day drama surrounding Jack Kevorkian is nearly impossible for a bimonthly newsletter, but several significant events are worth exploring--rulings on the constitutionality of Michigan's law barring suicide assistance, the impact of the 20th Kevorkian-assisted suicide of a physician, and the public's response to the book Final Exit.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Hospital ethics

自引率

0.00%

发文量