我们需要记录药物治疗干预吗?

W T Sawyer, F M Eckel
{"title":"我们需要记录药物治疗干预吗?","authors":"W T Sawyer,&nbsp;F M Eckel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have suggested that some pharmacotherapists may resist documentation because they view it as administrative intrusion rather than an essential component of continuity of care. In the final analysis, it is also a matter of the pharmacotherapist's belief. Pharmacists must understand what it is that they contribute, and must believe that it is both valuable and unique. It is not just an information management function--they are making patient-specific decisions and must be willing to be held accountable for their outcome. The pharmacy manager must also believe that such a responsible decision-making role represents that preferred future for the profession. Unfortunately, because many pharmacy managers have never truly functioned in such a role, developing such a belief system is difficult at best. The hospital administrator must also be made to believe that the contribution of the pharmacist to patient care not only extends beyond materials management but represents an entirely separate professional function. This will not occur simply through documentation of interventions. Yes, we believe that it is necessary to document pharmacotherapeutic interventions, however, not for the reasons that it is most frequently demanded.</p>","PeriodicalId":79758,"journal":{"name":"Topics in hospital pharmacy management","volume":"11 4","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we have to document pharmacotherapeutic interventions?\",\"authors\":\"W T Sawyer,&nbsp;F M Eckel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have suggested that some pharmacotherapists may resist documentation because they view it as administrative intrusion rather than an essential component of continuity of care. In the final analysis, it is also a matter of the pharmacotherapist's belief. Pharmacists must understand what it is that they contribute, and must believe that it is both valuable and unique. It is not just an information management function--they are making patient-specific decisions and must be willing to be held accountable for their outcome. The pharmacy manager must also believe that such a responsible decision-making role represents that preferred future for the profession. Unfortunately, because many pharmacy managers have never truly functioned in such a role, developing such a belief system is difficult at best. The hospital administrator must also be made to believe that the contribution of the pharmacist to patient care not only extends beyond materials management but represents an entirely separate professional function. This will not occur simply through documentation of interventions. Yes, we believe that it is necessary to document pharmacotherapeutic interventions, however, not for the reasons that it is most frequently demanded.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in hospital pharmacy management\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in hospital pharmacy management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in hospital pharmacy management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们建议,一些药物治疗师可能会抵制文件,因为他们认为这是行政干预,而不是护理连续性的必要组成部分。归根结底,这也是一个药物治疗师的信念问题。药剂师必须明白他们的贡献是什么,必须相信这是有价值的和独特的。这不仅仅是一项信息管理职能——他们正在做出针对具体患者的决定,必须愿意对自己的结果负责。药房经理还必须相信,这种负责任的决策角色代表了该行业的首选未来。不幸的是,由于许多药房经理从未真正扮演过这样的角色,所以要建立这样的信念体系是很困难的。还必须使医院管理者相信,药剂师对病人护理的贡献不仅超出了物资管理,而且代表了一种完全独立的专业职能。这不能简单地通过记录干预措施来实现。是的,我们认为有必要记录药物治疗干预措施,然而,不是因为最经常需要的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do we have to document pharmacotherapeutic interventions?

We have suggested that some pharmacotherapists may resist documentation because they view it as administrative intrusion rather than an essential component of continuity of care. In the final analysis, it is also a matter of the pharmacotherapist's belief. Pharmacists must understand what it is that they contribute, and must believe that it is both valuable and unique. It is not just an information management function--they are making patient-specific decisions and must be willing to be held accountable for their outcome. The pharmacy manager must also believe that such a responsible decision-making role represents that preferred future for the profession. Unfortunately, because many pharmacy managers have never truly functioned in such a role, developing such a belief system is difficult at best. The hospital administrator must also be made to believe that the contribution of the pharmacist to patient care not only extends beyond materials management but represents an entirely separate professional function. This will not occur simply through documentation of interventions. Yes, we believe that it is necessary to document pharmacotherapeutic interventions, however, not for the reasons that it is most frequently demanded.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信