排放分析和记录汇编的现行做法。

A H Peden
{"title":"排放分析和记录汇编的现行做法。","authors":"A H Peden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Are practitioners adopting the \"less is best\" philosophy for management of medical records? Making record abstracting less time consuming, and assembling charts to appear as they do on the patient units have been debated over recent years. This article reports on a survey of practitioners to see if newer methods are being adopted or if traditional practice prevails.</p>","PeriodicalId":79656,"journal":{"name":"Journal (American Medical Record Association)","volume":"61 10","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current practices in discharge analysis and record assembly.\",\"authors\":\"A H Peden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Are practitioners adopting the \\\"less is best\\\" philosophy for management of medical records? Making record abstracting less time consuming, and assembling charts to appear as they do on the patient units have been debated over recent years. This article reports on a survey of practitioners to see if newer methods are being adopted or if traditional practice prevails.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal (American Medical Record Association)\",\"volume\":\"61 10\",\"pages\":\"37-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal (American Medical Record Association)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal (American Medical Record Association)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从业人员是否采用“越少越好”的医疗记录管理理念?近年来,人们一直在争论如何减少记录抽象的时间消耗,以及如何将图表组合在一起,使其像在病人单位一样出现。这篇文章报告了对从业者的调查,看看是否采用了新的方法,或者传统的做法是否盛行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current practices in discharge analysis and record assembly.

Are practitioners adopting the "less is best" philosophy for management of medical records? Making record abstracting less time consuming, and assembling charts to appear as they do on the patient units have been debated over recent years. This article reports on a survey of practitioners to see if newer methods are being adopted or if traditional practice prevails.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信