干扰因素——它们也会有偏见吗?

Journal of outcome measurement Pub Date : 1999-01-01
S Alagumalai, J P Keeves
{"title":"干扰因素——它们也会有偏见吗?","authors":"S Alagumalai,&nbsp;J P Keeves","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous work has been done on item bias and differential item functioning. Although there is some research on distractor analysis, no detailed study has been attempted to examine the way distractors in an item function, with regards to comparing distractor performance. This paper examines how distractors function differentially and compares various methods for identifying this. The Pearson chi-square, likelihood ratio chi-square and Neyman weighted least squares chi-square tests are some of these methods. Possible causes of distractor bias are discussed with illustrations from a physics problem-solving scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":79673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of outcome measurement","volume":"3 1","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distractors--can they be biased too?\",\"authors\":\"S Alagumalai,&nbsp;J P Keeves\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous work has been done on item bias and differential item functioning. Although there is some research on distractor analysis, no detailed study has been attempted to examine the way distractors in an item function, with regards to comparing distractor performance. This paper examines how distractors function differentially and compares various methods for identifying this. The Pearson chi-square, likelihood ratio chi-square and Neyman weighted least squares chi-square tests are some of these methods. Possible causes of distractor bias are discussed with illustrations from a physics problem-solving scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"89-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of outcome measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of outcome measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在项目偏差和差异项目功能方面已经做了大量的工作。虽然有一些关于干扰物分析的研究,但没有详细的研究试图检验干扰物在项目中的作用方式,并比较干扰物的表现。本文考察了干扰物的功能差异,并比较了识别干扰物的各种方法。皮尔逊卡方、似然比卡方和内曼加权最小二乘卡方检验就是这些方法中的一些。用物理问题解决量表的插图讨论了干扰物偏差的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distractors--can they be biased too?

Numerous work has been done on item bias and differential item functioning. Although there is some research on distractor analysis, no detailed study has been attempted to examine the way distractors in an item function, with regards to comparing distractor performance. This paper examines how distractors function differentially and compares various methods for identifying this. The Pearson chi-square, likelihood ratio chi-square and Neyman weighted least squares chi-square tests are some of these methods. Possible causes of distractor bias are discussed with illustrations from a physics problem-solving scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信