脑卒中护理研究。复习一下。

Axone (Dartmouth, N.S.) Pub Date : 1998-09-01
D Bisnaire
{"title":"脑卒中护理研究。复习一下。","authors":"D Bisnaire","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses have demonstrated an interest in research in stroke. Studies encompass a broad variety of subjects; some clearly within the traditional realm of nursing and others that are common to multiple disciplines. Studies are limited in number and most lack the necessary numbers or controls that make data meaningful. Important beginnings are evident. Research about nurses who care for stroke survivors attempts to find correlations between attitudes and knowledge or outcome measures. Care delivery systems and models of nursing practice may impact on a variety of outcome measures, both those which are patient centred (functional status, quality of life) and those which are system driven (length of stay, recidivism). Information regarding the experience of stroke is rich in detail but limited in quantity. Much more information must be gained from a broader segment of the population to provide a baseline of understanding. Similarly, caregiver research begins to touch on the experience but considerable variation must exist between spouse caregivers and adult children or others, and between cultures. Finally, our interventions and their effect on outcomes are only just beginning to be studied. We remain a great distance from our ideal \"evidence based practice\". On a positive note, the research that nurses have conducted within the field of stroke is indicative of the broad interests that exist. To provide the care that is needed for our aging population while resources shift and shrink, it is essential that we not only test our interventions and their impact on outcomes but that we also are prepared to blur the traditional professional boundaries. Nurses do not have a monopoly on family centred care and care for the caregivers, nor do we act in isolation when we implement strategies to normalize bowel function post stroke. Collaborative research between disciplines and across cultural and political barriers is essential; resources for funding are available but have not been successfully accessed. The time is now for research by nurses and colleagues to begin to bridge the many knowledge gaps that persist.</p>","PeriodicalId":77025,"journal":{"name":"Axone (Dartmouth, N.S.)","volume":"20 1","pages":"10-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing research in stroke. A review.\",\"authors\":\"D Bisnaire\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nurses have demonstrated an interest in research in stroke. Studies encompass a broad variety of subjects; some clearly within the traditional realm of nursing and others that are common to multiple disciplines. Studies are limited in number and most lack the necessary numbers or controls that make data meaningful. Important beginnings are evident. Research about nurses who care for stroke survivors attempts to find correlations between attitudes and knowledge or outcome measures. Care delivery systems and models of nursing practice may impact on a variety of outcome measures, both those which are patient centred (functional status, quality of life) and those which are system driven (length of stay, recidivism). Information regarding the experience of stroke is rich in detail but limited in quantity. Much more information must be gained from a broader segment of the population to provide a baseline of understanding. Similarly, caregiver research begins to touch on the experience but considerable variation must exist between spouse caregivers and adult children or others, and between cultures. Finally, our interventions and their effect on outcomes are only just beginning to be studied. We remain a great distance from our ideal \\\"evidence based practice\\\". On a positive note, the research that nurses have conducted within the field of stroke is indicative of the broad interests that exist. To provide the care that is needed for our aging population while resources shift and shrink, it is essential that we not only test our interventions and their impact on outcomes but that we also are prepared to blur the traditional professional boundaries. Nurses do not have a monopoly on family centred care and care for the caregivers, nor do we act in isolation when we implement strategies to normalize bowel function post stroke. Collaborative research between disciplines and across cultural and political barriers is essential; resources for funding are available but have not been successfully accessed. The time is now for research by nurses and colleagues to begin to bridge the many knowledge gaps that persist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Axone (Dartmouth, N.S.)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"10-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Axone (Dartmouth, N.S.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Axone (Dartmouth, N.S.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护士们已经表现出对中风研究的兴趣。研究包括各种各样的科目;有些显然是在传统的护理领域,有些则是在多个学科中常见的。研究数量有限,大多数缺乏必要的数据或控制,使数据有意义。重要的开端是显而易见的。对护理中风幸存者的护士的研究试图找到态度与知识或结果测量之间的相关性。护理服务系统和护理实践模式可能会影响各种结果测量,包括那些以患者为中心的(功能状态、生活质量)和那些以系统为驱动的(住院时间、再犯)。有关中风经验的信息细节丰富,但数量有限。必须从更广泛的人口中获得更多的资料,以提供了解的基线。同样,对照顾者的研究也开始触及这种经历,但在配偶照顾者与成年子女或其他人之间,以及不同文化之间,必然存在相当大的差异。最后,我们的干预措施及其对结果的影响才刚刚开始被研究。我们离理想的“循证实践”还有很大的距离。从积极的方面来看,护士在中风领域进行的研究表明,存在广泛的兴趣。为了在资源转移和萎缩的同时为老龄化人口提供所需的护理,我们不仅要测试我们的干预措施及其对结果的影响,而且要准备好模糊传统的专业界限。护士并不垄断以家庭为中心的护理和对护理者的护理,当我们实施使中风后肠道功能正常化的策略时,我们也不是孤立地行动。学科之间以及跨越文化和政治障碍的合作研究至关重要;筹资资源是有的,但尚未成功获得。现在是护士和同事进行研究的时候了,要开始弥合许多仍然存在的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing research in stroke. A review.

Nurses have demonstrated an interest in research in stroke. Studies encompass a broad variety of subjects; some clearly within the traditional realm of nursing and others that are common to multiple disciplines. Studies are limited in number and most lack the necessary numbers or controls that make data meaningful. Important beginnings are evident. Research about nurses who care for stroke survivors attempts to find correlations between attitudes and knowledge or outcome measures. Care delivery systems and models of nursing practice may impact on a variety of outcome measures, both those which are patient centred (functional status, quality of life) and those which are system driven (length of stay, recidivism). Information regarding the experience of stroke is rich in detail but limited in quantity. Much more information must be gained from a broader segment of the population to provide a baseline of understanding. Similarly, caregiver research begins to touch on the experience but considerable variation must exist between spouse caregivers and adult children or others, and between cultures. Finally, our interventions and their effect on outcomes are only just beginning to be studied. We remain a great distance from our ideal "evidence based practice". On a positive note, the research that nurses have conducted within the field of stroke is indicative of the broad interests that exist. To provide the care that is needed for our aging population while resources shift and shrink, it is essential that we not only test our interventions and their impact on outcomes but that we also are prepared to blur the traditional professional boundaries. Nurses do not have a monopoly on family centred care and care for the caregivers, nor do we act in isolation when we implement strategies to normalize bowel function post stroke. Collaborative research between disciplines and across cultural and political barriers is essential; resources for funding are available but have not been successfully accessed. The time is now for research by nurses and colleagues to begin to bridge the many knowledge gaps that persist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信