防腐剂:在医院和社区环境中控制抗生素耐药菌中被遗忘的武器?

D N Payne, S A Gibson, R Lewis
{"title":"防腐剂:在医院和社区环境中控制抗生素耐药菌中被遗忘的武器?","authors":"D N Payne,&nbsp;S A Gibson,&nbsp;R Lewis","doi":"10.1177/146642409811800105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to ascertain the activity of a selection of widely-used antiseptic/disinfectant agents against antibiotic resistant bacteria and strains isolated from patients infected with clinically significant species. Four antiseptic agents (Dettol, Dettol Hospital Concentrate, Savlon and Betadine) were tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus hirae, Vancomicin Resistant Enterococcus sp (VRE), Escherichia coli and E. coli 0157. The antiseptics were applied at recommended use dilutions and at a half and a quarter of those concentrations in a standard suspension test (EST). Organic material was added to mimic the presence of blood, protein and other such contaminants to be found in the clinical situation. All antiseptics tested were effective against both the antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant strains of S. aureus and E. hirae as well as normal and clinical strains of E. coli at recommended concentrations. All but Betadine were also effective against the antibiotic resistant bacteria at a half and a quarter of normal concentration. The iodine containing antiseptic, however, failed the test against MRSA at a half normal concentration and showed virtually no activity against MRSA at a quarter normal concentration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","volume":"118 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642409811800105","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antiseptics: a forgotten weapon in the control of antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospital and community settings?\",\"authors\":\"D N Payne,&nbsp;S A Gibson,&nbsp;R Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/146642409811800105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to ascertain the activity of a selection of widely-used antiseptic/disinfectant agents against antibiotic resistant bacteria and strains isolated from patients infected with clinically significant species. Four antiseptic agents (Dettol, Dettol Hospital Concentrate, Savlon and Betadine) were tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus hirae, Vancomicin Resistant Enterococcus sp (VRE), Escherichia coli and E. coli 0157. The antiseptics were applied at recommended use dilutions and at a half and a quarter of those concentrations in a standard suspension test (EST). Organic material was added to mimic the presence of blood, protein and other such contaminants to be found in the clinical situation. All antiseptics tested were effective against both the antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant strains of S. aureus and E. hirae as well as normal and clinical strains of E. coli at recommended concentrations. All but Betadine were also effective against the antibiotic resistant bacteria at a half and a quarter of normal concentration. The iodine containing antiseptic, however, failed the test against MRSA at a half normal concentration and showed virtually no activity against MRSA at a quarter normal concentration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Health\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"18-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642409811800105\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409811800105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409811800105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本研究的目的是确定选择的广泛使用的抗菌/消毒液对抗生素耐药细菌和菌株的活性,这些细菌和菌株是从感染临床重要物种的患者中分离出来的。检测4种抗菌剂(Dettol、Dettol医院浓缩液、Savlon和Betadine)对金黄色葡萄球菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、霍乱肠球菌、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)、大肠杆菌和大肠杆菌0157的抑菌作用。在标准悬浮液试验(EST)中,以推荐的使用稀释度和一半和四分之一的浓度应用防腐剂。添加有机材料来模拟血液、蛋白质和其他临床情况下发现的污染物的存在。所有测试的防腐剂在推荐浓度下对金黄色葡萄球菌和希雷埃氏杆菌的抗生素敏感和耐药菌株以及大肠杆菌的正常和临床菌株都有效。在正常浓度的一半和四分之一时,除倍他定外,所有药物对抗生素耐药细菌都有效。然而,含碘抗菌剂在正常浓度的一半下对MRSA的检测失败,在正常浓度的四分之一下对MRSA几乎没有活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antiseptics: a forgotten weapon in the control of antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospital and community settings?

The aim of this study was to ascertain the activity of a selection of widely-used antiseptic/disinfectant agents against antibiotic resistant bacteria and strains isolated from patients infected with clinically significant species. Four antiseptic agents (Dettol, Dettol Hospital Concentrate, Savlon and Betadine) were tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus hirae, Vancomicin Resistant Enterococcus sp (VRE), Escherichia coli and E. coli 0157. The antiseptics were applied at recommended use dilutions and at a half and a quarter of those concentrations in a standard suspension test (EST). Organic material was added to mimic the presence of blood, protein and other such contaminants to be found in the clinical situation. All antiseptics tested were effective against both the antibiotic sensitive and antibiotic resistant strains of S. aureus and E. hirae as well as normal and clinical strains of E. coli at recommended concentrations. All but Betadine were also effective against the antibiotic resistant bacteria at a half and a quarter of normal concentration. The iodine containing antiseptic, however, failed the test against MRSA at a half normal concentration and showed virtually no activity against MRSA at a quarter normal concentration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信