保护性左主干狭窄定向冠脉切除术与球囊成形术定量冠脉造影结果的比较。

H Yasuda, T Hiraishi, S Sumitsuji, Y Nakagawa, A Fukuhara, E Tsuchikane, O Katoh, N Awata, T Kobayashi
{"title":"保护性左主干狭窄定向冠脉切除术与球囊成形术定量冠脉造影结果的比较。","authors":"H Yasuda,&nbsp;T Hiraishi,&nbsp;S Sumitsuji,&nbsp;Y Nakagawa,&nbsp;A Fukuhara,&nbsp;E Tsuchikane,&nbsp;O Katoh,&nbsp;N Awata,&nbsp;T Kobayashi","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA, 13 patients) with those after conventional balloon angioplasty (BA, 21 patients) in patients with protected left main coronary artery stenosis. The initial success rate was 100% in the DCA group and 81% (17 of 21) in the BA group. Restenosis was present in 2 of 11 patients in the DCA group and 9 of 16 patients in the BA group (18% vs. 56%, P < 0.05). DCA and BA improved a minimal lumen diameter. The initial gain after DCA was greater than that after BA. At follow-up, the minimal lumen diameter was larger and the percentage diameter stenosis was smaller in the DCA group than in the BA group. The late loss and loss index were equivalent in both groups. Compared with conventional BA, DCA in protected left main coronary artery stenosis is associated with a higher angiographic success rate and provides a wider luminal diameter with reduced incidence of restenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of quantitative coronary angiographic results after directional coronary atherectomy and balloon angioplasty of protected left main coronary stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"H Yasuda,&nbsp;T Hiraishi,&nbsp;S Sumitsuji,&nbsp;Y Nakagawa,&nbsp;A Fukuhara,&nbsp;E Tsuchikane,&nbsp;O Katoh,&nbsp;N Awata,&nbsp;T Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA, 13 patients) with those after conventional balloon angioplasty (BA, 21 patients) in patients with protected left main coronary artery stenosis. The initial success rate was 100% in the DCA group and 81% (17 of 21) in the BA group. Restenosis was present in 2 of 11 patients in the DCA group and 9 of 16 patients in the BA group (18% vs. 56%, P < 0.05). DCA and BA improved a minimal lumen diameter. The initial gain after DCA was greater than that after BA. At follow-up, the minimal lumen diameter was larger and the percentage diameter stenosis was smaller in the DCA group than in the BA group. The late loss and loss index were equivalent in both groups. Compared with conventional BA, DCA in protected left main coronary artery stenosis is associated with a higher angiographic success rate and provides a wider luminal diameter with reduced incidence of restenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<138::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们比较了保护性左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者行定向冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术(DCA, 13例)和常规球囊血管成形术(BA, 21例)后的血管造影和临床结果。DCA组的初始成功率为100%,BA组为81%(17 / 21)。DCA组11例患者中2例出现再狭窄,BA组16例患者中9例出现再狭窄(18%比56%,P < 0.05)。DCA和BA改善了最小的管腔直径。DCA后的初始增益大于BA后。随访时,DCA组最小管腔直径大于BA组,管腔狭窄百分比小于BA组。两组的后期损失和损失指数相当。与常规BA相比,在受保护的冠状动脉左主干狭窄中,DCA具有更高的血管造影成功率,提供更宽的管腔直径,减少再狭窄的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of quantitative coronary angiographic results after directional coronary atherectomy and balloon angioplasty of protected left main coronary stenosis.

We compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA, 13 patients) with those after conventional balloon angioplasty (BA, 21 patients) in patients with protected left main coronary artery stenosis. The initial success rate was 100% in the DCA group and 81% (17 of 21) in the BA group. Restenosis was present in 2 of 11 patients in the DCA group and 9 of 16 patients in the BA group (18% vs. 56%, P < 0.05). DCA and BA improved a minimal lumen diameter. The initial gain after DCA was greater than that after BA. At follow-up, the minimal lumen diameter was larger and the percentage diameter stenosis was smaller in the DCA group than in the BA group. The late loss and loss index were equivalent in both groups. Compared with conventional BA, DCA in protected left main coronary artery stenosis is associated with a higher angiographic success rate and provides a wider luminal diameter with reduced incidence of restenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信