{"title":"热塑性胶根管封闭技术与侧缩的比较。","authors":"A A Chohayeb, C Tom","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This in vitro study compared the quality of filling the root canal by the conventional lateral condensation technique to the fill by the commercially available thermoplasticized gutta-percha method. Subjective radiographic evaluation of density, presence of voids, and extent of fill were made for each of the 20 freshly extracted maxillary central incisors used for this study. Voids were noted in 10% of the laterally condensed canals, versus 40% of those obturated with the thermoplasticized gutta-percha. The mean time (in seconds) to obturate the canals with lateral condensation was 387 (s = 112); of the experimental was 145 (s = 23). We conclude that thermoplastisizing and injecting the gutta-percha into the root canal was a fast and a relatively easy technique, but the resultant filling was no more dense, and was shorter apically than the laterally condensed gutta-percha.</p>","PeriodicalId":79693,"journal":{"name":"NDA journal","volume":"46 2","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of thermoplasticized gutta-percha root canal obturation technique to the lateral condensation.\",\"authors\":\"A A Chohayeb, C Tom\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This in vitro study compared the quality of filling the root canal by the conventional lateral condensation technique to the fill by the commercially available thermoplasticized gutta-percha method. Subjective radiographic evaluation of density, presence of voids, and extent of fill were made for each of the 20 freshly extracted maxillary central incisors used for this study. Voids were noted in 10% of the laterally condensed canals, versus 40% of those obturated with the thermoplasticized gutta-percha. The mean time (in seconds) to obturate the canals with lateral condensation was 387 (s = 112); of the experimental was 145 (s = 23). We conclude that thermoplastisizing and injecting the gutta-percha into the root canal was a fast and a relatively easy technique, but the resultant filling was no more dense, and was shorter apically than the laterally condensed gutta-percha.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NDA journal\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"18-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NDA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项体外研究比较了传统的侧缩技术和市售的热塑性杜仲胶充填根管的质量。对20个新拔除的上颌中切牙的密度、有无空隙和填充程度进行主观x线摄影评估。在10%的侧缩管中发现了空洞,而用热塑性胶胶封闭的管中有40%的空洞。封闭侧缩管的平均时间(秒)为387 (s = 112);其中145例(s = 23)。我们得出结论,热塑性塑化和注入杜仲胶根管是一种快速和相对容易的技术,但所得到的填充并不比侧边凝聚的杜仲胶更致密,根尖更短。
Comparison of thermoplasticized gutta-percha root canal obturation technique to the lateral condensation.
This in vitro study compared the quality of filling the root canal by the conventional lateral condensation technique to the fill by the commercially available thermoplasticized gutta-percha method. Subjective radiographic evaluation of density, presence of voids, and extent of fill were made for each of the 20 freshly extracted maxillary central incisors used for this study. Voids were noted in 10% of the laterally condensed canals, versus 40% of those obturated with the thermoplasticized gutta-percha. The mean time (in seconds) to obturate the canals with lateral condensation was 387 (s = 112); of the experimental was 145 (s = 23). We conclude that thermoplastisizing and injecting the gutta-percha into the root canal was a fast and a relatively easy technique, but the resultant filling was no more dense, and was shorter apically than the laterally condensed gutta-percha.