专科护士抗凝服务的评价。

F C Taylor, E Gaminara, H Cohen, M Ramsay, D Miller
{"title":"专科护士抗凝服务的评价。","authors":"F C Taylor,&nbsp;E Gaminara,&nbsp;H Cohen,&nbsp;M Ramsay,&nbsp;D Miller","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safe levels of anticoagulation are normally considered to be achieved if patients are maintained within their therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range for 70% or more time, but evidence in the United Kingdom suggests that this is often not attained. Recently, alternative models in the management of out-patient anticoagulation have been investigated with favourable results. We report on a study which compared a consultant anticoagulant service (CAS) with a nurse specialist service (NSAS). A sequential design was used with data collected on the consultant run service (CAS), followed by similar data on a NSAS over two 6 month periods. Two patient groups were recruited: those newly referred (group A) and those on long-term treatment (group B). Outcomes were the proportion of time patients spent within INR range, documentation of relevant clinical details, number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and patient knowledge. The results indicate that the NSAS was as good as the CAS in maintaining therapeutic control and better at documenting relevant clinical details in reducing the number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and in improving some aspects of patient knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10285,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","volume":"19 4","pages":"267-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a nurse specialist anticoagulant service.\",\"authors\":\"F C Taylor,&nbsp;E Gaminara,&nbsp;H Cohen,&nbsp;M Ramsay,&nbsp;D Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Safe levels of anticoagulation are normally considered to be achieved if patients are maintained within their therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range for 70% or more time, but evidence in the United Kingdom suggests that this is often not attained. Recently, alternative models in the management of out-patient anticoagulation have been investigated with favourable results. We report on a study which compared a consultant anticoagulant service (CAS) with a nurse specialist service (NSAS). A sequential design was used with data collected on the consultant run service (CAS), followed by similar data on a NSAS over two 6 month periods. Two patient groups were recruited: those newly referred (group A) and those on long-term treatment (group B). Outcomes were the proportion of time patients spent within INR range, documentation of relevant clinical details, number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and patient knowledge. The results indicate that the NSAS was as good as the CAS in maintaining therapeutic control and better at documenting relevant clinical details in reducing the number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and in improving some aspects of patient knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and laboratory haematology\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"267-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and laboratory haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00082.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

如果患者在治疗性国际标准化比率(INR)范围内维持70%或更长时间,通常被认为达到了安全抗凝水平,但英国的证据表明,这通常无法达到。最近,在门诊抗凝治疗管理的替代模式已进行了调查,并取得了良好的结果。我们报告了一项比较咨询抗凝服务(CAS)和护士专科服务(NSAS)的研究。在咨询师运行服务(CAS)上收集的数据采用顺序设计,随后在两个6个月期间在NSAS上收集类似数据。招募了两组患者:新转诊的患者(A组)和长期治疗的患者(B组)。结果是患者在INR范围内的时间比例、相关临床细节的记录、可能与止血功能产生不良相互作用和/或抑制止血功能的药物的数量以及患者的知识。结果表明,NSAS在维持治疗控制方面与CAS一样好,在记录相关临床细节方面更好,减少了可能与止血功能产生不良相互作用和/或抑制止血功能的药物的服用数量,并提高了患者知识的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a nurse specialist anticoagulant service.

Safe levels of anticoagulation are normally considered to be achieved if patients are maintained within their therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range for 70% or more time, but evidence in the United Kingdom suggests that this is often not attained. Recently, alternative models in the management of out-patient anticoagulation have been investigated with favourable results. We report on a study which compared a consultant anticoagulant service (CAS) with a nurse specialist service (NSAS). A sequential design was used with data collected on the consultant run service (CAS), followed by similar data on a NSAS over two 6 month periods. Two patient groups were recruited: those newly referred (group A) and those on long-term treatment (group B). Outcomes were the proportion of time patients spent within INR range, documentation of relevant clinical details, number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and patient knowledge. The results indicate that the NSAS was as good as the CAS in maintaining therapeutic control and better at documenting relevant clinical details in reducing the number of drugs taken which may adversely interact with and/or inhibit haemostatic function and in improving some aspects of patient knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信