局部麻醉下门诊痔疮切除术。

A Lacerda-Filho, J R Cunha-Melo
{"title":"局部麻醉下门诊痔疮切除术。","authors":"A Lacerda-Filho,&nbsp;J R Cunha-Melo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare early and late results and costs of outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia with those of inpatient haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study with historical controls.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>51 patients who required haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Early and late results and comparative costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One patient was withdrawn from the study because of hypertension and subsequently lost to follow-up. The remaining 50 patients were discharged a mean of 68 (23) minutes after operation. Twelve patients complained of severe pain, one had faecal impaction and 2 developed bleeding. One patient developed urinary retention, compared with 18 in the historical group (p < 0.001). Forty-two patients (84%) were thoroughly satisfied with their treatment. Late complications did not differ significantly from those observed in the historical group. The estimated hospital costs were US$ 313.6 for outpatient, and US$ 716 for inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia was safe and comfortable for most patients, with complication rates comparable to or better than those observed after inpatient treatment and at less than half the cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"A Lacerda-Filho,&nbsp;J R Cunha-Melo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare early and late results and costs of outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia with those of inpatient haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study with historical controls.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>51 patients who required haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Early and late results and comparative costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One patient was withdrawn from the study because of hypertension and subsequently lost to follow-up. The remaining 50 patients were discharged a mean of 68 (23) minutes after operation. Twelve patients complained of severe pain, one had faecal impaction and 2 developed bleeding. One patient developed urinary retention, compared with 18 in the historical group (p < 0.001). Forty-two patients (84%) were thoroughly satisfied with their treatment. Late complications did not differ significantly from those observed in the historical group. The estimated hospital costs were US$ 313.6 for outpatient, and US$ 716 for inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia was safe and comfortable for most patients, with complication rates comparable to or better than those observed after inpatient treatment and at less than half the cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较局麻门诊痔切除术与住院痔切除术的早期和晚期效果及费用。设计:前瞻性研究与历史对照。地点:巴西大学医院。研究对象:51例痔切除术患者。干预措施:局部麻醉下门诊痔疮切除术。主要结果测量:早期和后期结果和比较成本。结果:1例患者因高血压退出研究,随后失去随访。其余50例患者术后平均68(23)分钟出院。12例患者主诉剧痛,1例出现大便嵌塞,2例出现出血。1例患者出现尿潴留,而历史组为18例(p < 0.001)。42例患者(84%)对治疗完全满意。晚期并发症与历史组无明显差异。门诊费用估计为313.6美元,住院治疗费用估计为716美元。结论:局部麻醉下门诊痔疮切除术对大多数患者来说是安全舒适的,并发症发生率与住院治疗相当或更好,费用不到住院治疗的一半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.

Objective: To compare early and late results and costs of outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia with those of inpatient haemorrhoidectomy.

Design: Prospective study with historical controls.

Setting: University hospital, Brazil.

Subjects: 51 patients who required haemorrhoidectomy.

Interventions: Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia.

Main outcome measures: Early and late results and comparative costs.

Results: One patient was withdrawn from the study because of hypertension and subsequently lost to follow-up. The remaining 50 patients were discharged a mean of 68 (23) minutes after operation. Twelve patients complained of severe pain, one had faecal impaction and 2 developed bleeding. One patient developed urinary retention, compared with 18 in the historical group (p < 0.001). Forty-two patients (84%) were thoroughly satisfied with their treatment. Late complications did not differ significantly from those observed in the historical group. The estimated hospital costs were US$ 313.6 for outpatient, and US$ 716 for inpatient treatment.

Conclusion: Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia was safe and comfortable for most patients, with complication rates comparable to or better than those observed after inpatient treatment and at less than half the cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信