自然计划生育效果:评价已发表的报告。

V Lamprecht, J Trussell
{"title":"自然计划生育效果:评价已发表的报告。","authors":"V Lamprecht,&nbsp;J Trussell","doi":"10.1023/a:1006595703472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To equip the reader with the tools necessary to evaluate studies of natural family planning (NFP) effectiveness found in the literature and to make recommendations for future NFP effectiveness studies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Current standards to evaluate contraceptive method effectiveness are reviewed. A framework for evaluating reports on NFP is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most NFP studies found in the literature are flawed in design and do not calculate pregnancy rates correctly. The results from the few well-designed studies are presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many factors influence NFP effectiveness, and these factors must be considered when evaluating published studies and designing future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"13 2-3","pages":"155-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006595703472","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports.\",\"authors\":\"V Lamprecht,&nbsp;J Trussell\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1006595703472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To equip the reader with the tools necessary to evaluate studies of natural family planning (NFP) effectiveness found in the literature and to make recommendations for future NFP effectiveness studies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Current standards to evaluate contraceptive method effectiveness are reviewed. A framework for evaluating reports on NFP is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most NFP studies found in the literature are flawed in design and do not calculate pregnancy rates correctly. The results from the few well-designed studies are presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many factors influence NFP effectiveness, and these factors must be considered when evaluating published studies and designing future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"volume\":\"13 2-3\",\"pages\":\"155-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006595703472\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006595703472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006595703472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

目的:为读者提供必要的工具来评估文献中自然计划生育(NFP)有效性的研究,并为未来的NFP有效性研究提出建议。设计:评估避孕方法有效性的现行标准。提出了评价NFP报告的框架。结果:文献中发现的大多数NFP研究在设计上存在缺陷,没有正确计算妊娠率。本文介绍了少数精心设计的研究的结果。讨论:影响NFP有效性的因素很多,在评价已发表的研究和设计未来研究时必须考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports.

Objective: To equip the reader with the tools necessary to evaluate studies of natural family planning (NFP) effectiveness found in the literature and to make recommendations for future NFP effectiveness studies.

Design: Current standards to evaluate contraceptive method effectiveness are reviewed. A framework for evaluating reports on NFP is presented.

Results: Most NFP studies found in the literature are flawed in design and do not calculate pregnancy rates correctly. The results from the few well-designed studies are presented.

Discussion: Many factors influence NFP effectiveness, and these factors must be considered when evaluating published studies and designing future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信