比较公共部门和私营部门NFP计划:对NFP扩张的影响。

S Girotto, A Zanichelli, G C Stevanella, G Fattorini, L Santi, D Chiossi, J Rötzer
{"title":"比较公共部门和私营部门NFP计划:对NFP扩张的影响。","authors":"S Girotto,&nbsp;A Zanichelli,&nbsp;G C Stevanella,&nbsp;G Fattorini,&nbsp;L Santi,&nbsp;D Chiossi,&nbsp;J Rötzer","doi":"10.1023/a:1006568324853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper synthesizes a six year collaboration between a natural family planning (NFP) non-governmental organization (NGO) and the National Health Service of the Emilia Romagna region in Italy. It also compares the public program experience with NFP services provided in the private sector in the adjacent region of Veneto. Midwives provided NFP services in government family health clinics while in the private sector NFP was taught by non-health laypersons in a church-based facility. The populations served by these two programs were different. Women in the public sector were slightly older and two-thirds were married. Forty percent of the clients had chosen to use NFP to achieve a pregnancy. The private sector client, recruited in part through premarriage counseling programs, was equally divided between married and single women, though the majority came for advice on avoiding or spacing pregnancies. In both regions NFP users were more highly educated than the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"13 2-3","pages":"255-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006568324853","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing a public and private sector NFP program: implications for NFP expansion.\",\"authors\":\"S Girotto,&nbsp;A Zanichelli,&nbsp;G C Stevanella,&nbsp;G Fattorini,&nbsp;L Santi,&nbsp;D Chiossi,&nbsp;J Rötzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1006568324853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper synthesizes a six year collaboration between a natural family planning (NFP) non-governmental organization (NGO) and the National Health Service of the Emilia Romagna region in Italy. It also compares the public program experience with NFP services provided in the private sector in the adjacent region of Veneto. Midwives provided NFP services in government family health clinics while in the private sector NFP was taught by non-health laypersons in a church-based facility. The populations served by these two programs were different. Women in the public sector were slightly older and two-thirds were married. Forty percent of the clients had chosen to use NFP to achieve a pregnancy. The private sector client, recruited in part through premarriage counseling programs, was equally divided between married and single women, though the majority came for advice on avoiding or spacing pregnancies. In both regions NFP users were more highly educated than the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"volume\":\"13 2-3\",\"pages\":\"255-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006568324853\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006568324853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006568324853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文综合了一个自然计划生育(NFP)非政府组织(NGO)与意大利艾米利亚罗马涅地区国家卫生局之间的六年合作。报告还将公共项目的经验与威尼托邻近地区私营部门提供的NFP服务进行了比较。助产士在政府家庭保健诊所提供国家计划生育服务,而在私营部门,国家计划生育由非卫生专业人员在教堂设施中教授。这两个项目所服务的人群是不同的。公共部门的妇女年龄稍大,三分之二已婚。40%的客户选择使用NFP来实现怀孕。私营部门的客户部分是通过婚前咨询项目吸引来的,其中已婚和单身女性的比例相当,不过大多数是为了寻求避免怀孕或间隔怀孕的建议。在这两个地区,NFP使用者比一般人口受教育程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing a public and private sector NFP program: implications for NFP expansion.

This paper synthesizes a six year collaboration between a natural family planning (NFP) non-governmental organization (NGO) and the National Health Service of the Emilia Romagna region in Italy. It also compares the public program experience with NFP services provided in the private sector in the adjacent region of Veneto. Midwives provided NFP services in government family health clinics while in the private sector NFP was taught by non-health laypersons in a church-based facility. The populations served by these two programs were different. Women in the public sector were slightly older and two-thirds were married. Forty percent of the clients had chosen to use NFP to achieve a pregnancy. The private sector client, recruited in part through premarriage counseling programs, was equally divided between married and single women, though the majority came for advice on avoiding or spacing pregnancies. In both regions NFP users were more highly educated than the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信