开发关键路径的三种替代方法的成本和效益。

M Williams
{"title":"开发关键路径的三种替代方法的成本和效益。","authors":"M Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.</p>","PeriodicalId":79476,"journal":{"name":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","volume":"1 3","pages":"126-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three alternative methods of developing critical pathways cost and benefits.\",\"authors\":\"M Williams\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"126-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将评估确定最佳路径的三种常用方法及其附带的成本和时间要求。用于制定和调整路径的常用方法是使用已发布的指南,在现有卫生保健系统内创建路径和使用自动化工具。每种方法所需的成本和时间差别很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three alternative methods of developing critical pathways cost and benefits.

Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信