私营部门的开放获取资金持有内窥镜。

J Martin, P Arlett, G Holdstock
{"title":"私营部门的开放获取资金持有内窥镜。","authors":"J Martin,&nbsp;P Arlett,&nbsp;G Holdstock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a comparative study of 150 patients referred for endoscopy to an NHS hospital and 150 patients referred to an open access scheme in the private sector for fundholding GPs. The concept of consultoscopy, whereby a consultant gastroenterologist gives an opinion at the same visit as the endoscopy is performed, is introduced. Results showed a similar number of normal studies (about 40%) were performed in each group, although the number of examinations showing serious pathology was significantly higher in the fundholding group (p < 0.01). Patients seen in the fundholding scheme had less sedation, required fewer outpatient appointments, and the GPs were given more advice on further management than those seen in the non-fundholding group. We conclude that open access endoscopy in the private sector is a workable option and may result in work being transferred from NHS hospitals to the private sector unless NHS hospitals review their working practices. The concept of consultoscopy is a useful development on traditional open access systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"51 2","pages":"71-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open access fundholding endoscopy in the private sector.\",\"authors\":\"J Martin,&nbsp;P Arlett,&nbsp;G Holdstock\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a comparative study of 150 patients referred for endoscopy to an NHS hospital and 150 patients referred to an open access scheme in the private sector for fundholding GPs. The concept of consultoscopy, whereby a consultant gastroenterologist gives an opinion at the same visit as the endoscopy is performed, is introduced. Results showed a similar number of normal studies (about 40%) were performed in each group, although the number of examinations showing serious pathology was significantly higher in the fundholding group (p < 0.01). Patients seen in the fundholding scheme had less sedation, required fewer outpatient appointments, and the GPs were given more advice on further management than those seen in the non-fundholding group. We conclude that open access endoscopy in the private sector is a workable option and may result in work being transferred from NHS hospitals to the private sector unless NHS hospitals review their working practices. The concept of consultoscopy is a useful development on traditional open access systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"71-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对150名患者进行了比较研究,其中150名患者转诊到NHS医院进行内窥镜检查,150名患者转诊到私营部门的开放获取方案中进行资金持有全科医生。介绍了会诊镜的概念,即胃肠病学顾问在进行内窥镜检查时给出意见。结果显示,各组正常检查数相近(约40%),但持基金组严重病理检查数明显高于对照组(p < 0.01)。在基金持有方案中看到的患者镇静较少,需要较少的门诊预约,并且全科医生在进一步管理方面得到了比非基金持有组更多的建议。我们的结论是,私营部门的开放式内窥镜检查是一个可行的选择,可能导致工作从NHS医院转移到私营部门,除非NHS医院审查其工作做法。会诊的概念是对传统开放存取系统的有益发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open access fundholding endoscopy in the private sector.

We conducted a comparative study of 150 patients referred for endoscopy to an NHS hospital and 150 patients referred to an open access scheme in the private sector for fundholding GPs. The concept of consultoscopy, whereby a consultant gastroenterologist gives an opinion at the same visit as the endoscopy is performed, is introduced. Results showed a similar number of normal studies (about 40%) were performed in each group, although the number of examinations showing serious pathology was significantly higher in the fundholding group (p < 0.01). Patients seen in the fundholding scheme had less sedation, required fewer outpatient appointments, and the GPs were given more advice on further management than those seen in the non-fundholding group. We conclude that open access endoscopy in the private sector is a workable option and may result in work being transferred from NHS hospitals to the private sector unless NHS hospitals review their working practices. The concept of consultoscopy is a useful development on traditional open access systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信