“受损的人性”:管理式医疗时代对以患者为中心的医学伦理的呼唤。

Theoretical medicine Pub Date : 1997-03-01
L R Churchill
{"title":"“受损的人性”:管理式医疗时代对以患者为中心的医学伦理的呼唤。","authors":"L R Churchill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Edmund Pellegrino claims that medical ethics must be derived from a perception of the patient's \"damaged humanity,\" rather than from the self-imposed duties of professionals. This essay explores the meaning and examines the challenges to this patient-centered ethic. Social scientific and bioethical interpretations of medicine constitute one kind of challenge. A more pervasive challenge is the ascendancy of managed care, and especially investor-owned, for-profit managed care. A list of questions addressed to patients, physicians and organizations is offered as one means of assessing this threat and moving toward morally trustworthy relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":77444,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine","volume":"18 1-2","pages":"113-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Damaged humanity\\\": the call for a patient-centered medical ethic in the managed care era.\",\"authors\":\"L R Churchill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Edmund Pellegrino claims that medical ethics must be derived from a perception of the patient's \\\"damaged humanity,\\\" rather than from the self-imposed duties of professionals. This essay explores the meaning and examines the challenges to this patient-centered ethic. Social scientific and bioethical interpretations of medicine constitute one kind of challenge. A more pervasive challenge is the ascendancy of managed care, and especially investor-owned, for-profit managed care. A list of questions addressed to patients, physicians and organizations is offered as one means of assessing this threat and moving toward morally trustworthy relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1-2\",\"pages\":\"113-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃德蒙·佩莱格里诺(Edmund Pellegrino)声称,医学伦理必须来自对病人“受损人性”的认知,而不是来自专业人员的自我强加的责任。本文探讨了这种以病人为中心的伦理的意义和挑战。医学的社会科学和生物伦理解释构成了一种挑战。一个更普遍的挑战是管理式医疗的优势,尤其是投资者拥有的、以营利为目的的管理式医疗。向病人、医生和组织提出了一系列问题,作为评估这种威胁和建立道德上值得信赖的关系的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Damaged humanity": the call for a patient-centered medical ethic in the managed care era.

Edmund Pellegrino claims that medical ethics must be derived from a perception of the patient's "damaged humanity," rather than from the self-imposed duties of professionals. This essay explores the meaning and examines the challenges to this patient-centered ethic. Social scientific and bioethical interpretations of medicine constitute one kind of challenge. A more pervasive challenge is the ascendancy of managed care, and especially investor-owned, for-profit managed care. A list of questions addressed to patients, physicians and organizations is offered as one means of assessing this threat and moving toward morally trustworthy relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信