医学概念编码:用计算机编码工具进行的对照实验。

J H Hohnloser, F Pürner, P Kadlec
{"title":"医学概念编码:用计算机编码工具进行的对照实验。","authors":"J H Hohnloser,&nbsp;F Pürner,&nbsp;P Kadlec","doi":"10.3109/14639239609025357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In medicine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with the available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time intensive and may significantly add to daily paperwork. We have developed a generic computerized encoding tool--the PADS (patient archiving and documentation system) encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol versus control). We present data demonstrating that a computerized coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and save time compared with the traditional approach: (a) the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% versus 86.1%); (b) coding errors were lower (0% versus 10.81%); (c) more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%); (d) fewer coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%); (e) the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% versus 66.02%); and (f) coding time was reduced by 50%.</p>","PeriodicalId":76132,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","volume":"21 3","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14639239609025357","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coding medical concepts: a controlled experiment with a computerized coding tool.\",\"authors\":\"J H Hohnloser,&nbsp;F Pürner,&nbsp;P Kadlec\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/14639239609025357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In medicine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with the available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time intensive and may significantly add to daily paperwork. We have developed a generic computerized encoding tool--the PADS (patient archiving and documentation system) encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol versus control). We present data demonstrating that a computerized coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and save time compared with the traditional approach: (a) the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% versus 86.1%); (b) coding errors were lower (0% versus 10.81%); (c) more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%); (d) fewer coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%); (e) the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% versus 66.02%); and (f) coding time was reduced by 50%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"199-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14639239609025357\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239609025357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239609025357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在医学上,越来越需要用现有的标准编码系统对医学概念进行编码。编码过程可能是时间密集的,并且可能会大大增加日常文书工作。我们开发了一种通用的计算机编码工具- PADS(患者档案和文档系统)编码器,以确保日常诊断的快速,正确和完整的编码。该工具集成到电子病历系统中,充分利用了用户友好的Macintosh界面。18名临床医生在对照实验中对该工具进行了测试,他们在每个方案(研究方案与对照方案)中编码了总共666个医学概念。我们提供的数据表明,与传统方法相比,计算机编码工具可以产生更完整、更高质量的数据,并节省时间:(a)正确编码的医学概念数量更高(99.55%比86.1%);(b)编码错误率较低(0%比10.81%);(c)更多修饰语代码被正确编码(增幅高达43%);(d)编码错误减少(最多减少43%);(e)主、修饰语编码的正确率和完成率提高了31.27%(97.29%比66.02%);(f)编码时间缩短50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coding medical concepts: a controlled experiment with a computerized coding tool.

In medicine there is a growing need to encode medical concepts with the available standard coding systems. The coding process can be time intensive and may significantly add to daily paperwork. We have developed a generic computerized encoding tool--the PADS (patient archiving and documentation system) encoder--to ensure rapid, correct and complete coding of diagnoses in daily routine. The tool is integrated into an electronic patient record system and takes full advantage of the user friendly Macintosh interface. The tool was tested in a controlled experiment by 18 clinicians who encoded a total of 666 medical concepts in each protocol (study protocol versus control). We present data demonstrating that a computerized coding tool can produce more complete data of higher quality and save time compared with the traditional approach: (a) the number of correctly encoded medical concepts was higher (99.55% versus 86.1%); (b) coding errors were lower (0% versus 10.81%); (c) more modifier codes were encoded correctly (increase by up to 43%); (d) fewer coding errors were made (decrease by up to 43%); (e) the overall rate of correctly encoded and complete main and modifier codes was increased by 31.27% (97.29% versus 66.02%); and (f) coding time was reduced by 50%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信