E Eeckhout, J C Stauffer, P Vogt, C Seydoux, J J Goy
{"title":"冠状动脉成形术中长夹层放置多种不同类型的支架。","authors":"E Eeckhout, J C Stauffer, P Vogt, C Seydoux, J J Goy","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":"39 3","pages":"302-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Placement of multiple and different stent types for very long dissections during coronary angioplasty.\",\"authors\":\"E Eeckhout, J C Stauffer, P Vogt, C Seydoux, J J Goy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"302-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199611)39:3<302::AID-CCD21>3.0.CO;2-F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
我们一直在研究冠状动脉成形术后夹层较长(> 20mm)的不利情况下放置多种不同类型支架的安全性和有效性。我们报告了20例患者的初步经验,他们接受了以下联合治疗:Palmaz-Schatz和Micro stent(14例)。Wallstent和Micro stent(4例);微支架(1例);Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent(1例)。除1例患者(无回流现象)外,其余患者均恢复了正常的远端血流,除2例患者外,其余患者均获得了夹层的完全覆盖。30天无事件生存率为90%(20例患者中有18例)。随访期间(平均8 +/- 3个月),2例患者死亡。在其他18例患者中,16例无症状且无并发症。其余2例患者采用标准血管成形术治疗症状性再狭窄。总之,对于标准血管成形术引起的长时间夹层,放置不同类型的支架似乎是一种可行、安全和有效的治疗方法。
Placement of multiple and different stent types for very long dissections during coronary angioplasty.
We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.