两种尖端压力传感器系统的体内比较。

A E Aubert, M Vrolix, H De Geest, F Van de Werf
{"title":"两种尖端压力传感器系统的体内比较。","authors":"A E Aubert,&nbsp;M Vrolix,&nbsp;H De Geest,&nbsp;F Van de Werf","doi":"10.1007/BF01142487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimental findings are presented of an in vivo comparison between a Sentron catheter and another tip transducer manometer: a Millar microtip catheter. Both catheters have been used simultaneously in the left ventricle of dogs. Pressure variations were elicited by drug infusion. Pressure values and derivatives obtained from both systems were compared. A cross correlation between episodes of the two pressures was computed. Results from this study showed good correlation between left ventricular systolic pressure measured with both manometers (R = 0.992, p < 0.0001), end-diastolic pressure (R = 0.809, p < 0.0001) and between first derivatives: positive derivative (R = 0.993, p < 0.0001) and negative (R = 0.634, p < 0.0001). The mean cross correlation between both pressure signals was 0.61 +/- 0.04. In the frequency domain no statistical difference was found between the location of the maxima of the peaks. It is concluded that a Sentron manometer can be a valid alternative, at a reasonable price, to a cheaper, though less accurate fluid filled catheter and a more expensive 'golden standard' microtip catheter.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"12 2","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01142487","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo comparison between two tip pressure transducer systems.\",\"authors\":\"A E Aubert,&nbsp;M Vrolix,&nbsp;H De Geest,&nbsp;F Van de Werf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF01142487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Experimental findings are presented of an in vivo comparison between a Sentron catheter and another tip transducer manometer: a Millar microtip catheter. Both catheters have been used simultaneously in the left ventricle of dogs. Pressure variations were elicited by drug infusion. Pressure values and derivatives obtained from both systems were compared. A cross correlation between episodes of the two pressures was computed. Results from this study showed good correlation between left ventricular systolic pressure measured with both manometers (R = 0.992, p < 0.0001), end-diastolic pressure (R = 0.809, p < 0.0001) and between first derivatives: positive derivative (R = 0.993, p < 0.0001) and negative (R = 0.634, p < 0.0001). The mean cross correlation between both pressure signals was 0.61 +/- 0.04. In the frequency domain no statistical difference was found between the location of the maxima of the peaks. It is concluded that a Sentron manometer can be a valid alternative, at a reasonable price, to a cheaper, though less accurate fluid filled catheter and a more expensive 'golden standard' microtip catheter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"77-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01142487\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

实验结果提出了Sentron导管和另一个尖端传感器压力计:米勒微尖端导管之间的体内比较。两种导管已同时用于狗的左心室。药物输注引起压力变化。比较了两种系统的压力值和导数。计算了两种压力发作之间的相互关系。本研究结果显示,两种压力计测量的左心室收缩压(R = 0.992, p < 0.0001)与舒张末期压(R = 0.809, p < 0.0001)以及一阶导数之间的相关性良好:正导数(R = 0.993, p < 0.0001)与负导数(R = 0.634, p < 0.0001)。两种压力信号的平均相关系数为0.61±0.04。在频域中,峰值的位置没有统计学差异。结论是,Sentron压力计可以以合理的价格替代更便宜,但精度较低的液体填充导管和更昂贵的“黄金标准”微尖导管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo comparison between two tip pressure transducer systems.

Experimental findings are presented of an in vivo comparison between a Sentron catheter and another tip transducer manometer: a Millar microtip catheter. Both catheters have been used simultaneously in the left ventricle of dogs. Pressure variations were elicited by drug infusion. Pressure values and derivatives obtained from both systems were compared. A cross correlation between episodes of the two pressures was computed. Results from this study showed good correlation between left ventricular systolic pressure measured with both manometers (R = 0.992, p < 0.0001), end-diastolic pressure (R = 0.809, p < 0.0001) and between first derivatives: positive derivative (R = 0.993, p < 0.0001) and negative (R = 0.634, p < 0.0001). The mean cross correlation between both pressure signals was 0.61 +/- 0.04. In the frequency domain no statistical difference was found between the location of the maxima of the peaks. It is concluded that a Sentron manometer can be a valid alternative, at a reasonable price, to a cheaper, though less accurate fluid filled catheter and a more expensive 'golden standard' microtip catheter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信