经皮内镜胃造口术在头颈部肿瘤患者中的应用。新胃造口术的评价[j]。

G.E.N Pub Date : 1995-10-01
W Dolfo, T Vetencourt, I Bombala, C Fernandez, D Fuentes, R Monserat, C Gumina, M Bronstein, J Salazar
{"title":"经皮内镜胃造口术在头颈部肿瘤患者中的应用。新胃造口术的评价[j]。","authors":"W Dolfo,&nbsp;T Vetencourt,&nbsp;I Bombala,&nbsp;C Fernandez,&nbsp;D Fuentes,&nbsp;R Monserat,&nbsp;C Gumina,&nbsp;M Bronstein,&nbsp;J Salazar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their aparition in 1980, percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), represented a dramatic impact in the enteral nutrition thecnics and their indication have expanded. The PEG have many advantages over the surgical gastrostomy. In this paper, we present our experience with the use of PEG in patients with head and neck cancer using a new home made gastrostome. Included were 61 patients 37 males (64.8%), 21 females (36.2%) with ages betwen 11 and 72 years. In 3 patients the PEG was not intended because tight esophageal stenoses. The PEG was completed in 56 cases (91.8%). In 5 patients (8.6%) there were minor complications (4 infections and 1 patient with pain). We have only one case of major complication which consisted in migration of gastrotome to the abdominal wall (Buried Bumper Syndrome). The gastrostome was patent between 15 and 312 days with a median of 125 days. The gastrostomies was made with siliconed 22Fr Foley catheter, crazy glue, and plastic tops. The Foley catheter is acid resistant and not deteriorate like other materials like latex. There was not adverse reaction at the ostomy site. The cost of the kit is about 11 US$ and the commercial kit is 125 US$, on the other hand the internal diameter is 15% wider than the commercial one.</p>","PeriodicalId":75872,"journal":{"name":"G.E.N","volume":"49 4","pages":"278-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck neoplasms. Evaluation of a new gastrostomy].\",\"authors\":\"W Dolfo,&nbsp;T Vetencourt,&nbsp;I Bombala,&nbsp;C Fernandez,&nbsp;D Fuentes,&nbsp;R Monserat,&nbsp;C Gumina,&nbsp;M Bronstein,&nbsp;J Salazar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since their aparition in 1980, percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), represented a dramatic impact in the enteral nutrition thecnics and their indication have expanded. The PEG have many advantages over the surgical gastrostomy. In this paper, we present our experience with the use of PEG in patients with head and neck cancer using a new home made gastrostome. Included were 61 patients 37 males (64.8%), 21 females (36.2%) with ages betwen 11 and 72 years. In 3 patients the PEG was not intended because tight esophageal stenoses. The PEG was completed in 56 cases (91.8%). In 5 patients (8.6%) there were minor complications (4 infections and 1 patient with pain). We have only one case of major complication which consisted in migration of gastrotome to the abdominal wall (Buried Bumper Syndrome). The gastrostome was patent between 15 and 312 days with a median of 125 days. The gastrostomies was made with siliconed 22Fr Foley catheter, crazy glue, and plastic tops. The Foley catheter is acid resistant and not deteriorate like other materials like latex. There was not adverse reaction at the ostomy site. The cost of the kit is about 11 US$ and the commercial kit is 125 US$, on the other hand the internal diameter is 15% wider than the commercial one.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"G.E.N\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"278-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"G.E.N\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G.E.N","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮内镜胃造口术(pertaneus endoscopic gastrostomstomy, PEG)自1980年问世以来,对肠内营养医学产生了巨大的影响,其适应症也在不断扩大。与外科胃造口术相比,聚乙二醇有许多优点。在本文中,我们介绍了我们在头颈癌患者中使用PEG的经验。纳入61例患者,男性37例(64.8%),女性21例(36.2%),年龄11 ~ 72岁。3例患者因食管狭窄而不进行PEG。56例(91.8%)完成了PEG。5例患者(8.6%)出现轻微并发症(4例感染,1例疼痛)。我们只有一例主要的并发症,包括胃组向腹壁的迁移(埋保险杠综合征)。胃瘘的发病时间为15 - 312天,中位时间为125天。胃造口是由硅胶22Fr Foley导管,疯狂胶和塑料顶制成的。Foley导管耐酸,不会像乳胶等其他材料那样变质。造口部位未见不良反应。该套件的成本约为11美元,商用套件为125美元,另一方面内径比商用套件宽15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck neoplasms. Evaluation of a new gastrostomy].

Since their aparition in 1980, percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), represented a dramatic impact in the enteral nutrition thecnics and their indication have expanded. The PEG have many advantages over the surgical gastrostomy. In this paper, we present our experience with the use of PEG in patients with head and neck cancer using a new home made gastrostome. Included were 61 patients 37 males (64.8%), 21 females (36.2%) with ages betwen 11 and 72 years. In 3 patients the PEG was not intended because tight esophageal stenoses. The PEG was completed in 56 cases (91.8%). In 5 patients (8.6%) there were minor complications (4 infections and 1 patient with pain). We have only one case of major complication which consisted in migration of gastrotome to the abdominal wall (Buried Bumper Syndrome). The gastrostome was patent between 15 and 312 days with a median of 125 days. The gastrostomies was made with siliconed 22Fr Foley catheter, crazy glue, and plastic tops. The Foley catheter is acid resistant and not deteriorate like other materials like latex. There was not adverse reaction at the ostomy site. The cost of the kit is about 11 US$ and the commercial kit is 125 US$, on the other hand the internal diameter is 15% wider than the commercial one.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信