B Carpiniello, A Baita, C M Pariante, W Orrù, A S Ruvinetti, N Rudas
{"title":"慢性疾病的家庭负担。慢性疾病对家庭影响问卷(IMPAT)的效度和可重复性研究[j]。","authors":"B Carpiniello, A Baita, C M Pariante, W Orrù, A S Ruvinetti, N Rudas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The \"Questionario sull'Impatto della Malattia Cronica sulla Famiglia\" (IMPAT) (\"Impact-on-Family Scale\", by Stein & Reissman) in its Italian version (by Casari & Fantino, modified) has been used to evaluate family burden in relatives of chronic patients with cancer, chronic patients with other internistic pathology and acute patients. The aims of the study were to evaluate validity and reliability of the Impat and to compare family burden and anxoius/depressive symptoms in the three groups of relatives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>35 relatives of cancer patients, 20 relatives of patients with chronic, non neoplastic illness and 20 relatives of acute patients were studied. 85% of relatives of cancer patients was assisted continuously by volunteers and psychiatrists with regard to their psychological problems. Impat questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were used for psychological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validity of the Impat was confirmed. Mean scores from relatives of chronic patients were higher than scores from relatives of acute patients (ANOVA, f = 38.0; df = 2,72; p < 0.0001). Test-retest analysis was satisfactory (Person's test, N = 20 r = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Both groups of relatives of chronic patients showed higher level of anxious-depressive symptoms compared to relatives of acute subjects. No differences were found between relatives of neoplastic and non neoplastic chronic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The italian version of Impat has been confirmed as a useful and simple means of evaluation of family burden in this context. Psychosocial support seems to reduce distress in relatives of cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":42192,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Psichiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The family burden in chronic diseases. The study of validity and reproducibility of the questionnaire on the impact of the chronic disease on the family (IMPAT)].\",\"authors\":\"B Carpiniello, A Baita, C M Pariante, W Orrù, A S Ruvinetti, N Rudas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The \\\"Questionario sull'Impatto della Malattia Cronica sulla Famiglia\\\" (IMPAT) (\\\"Impact-on-Family Scale\\\", by Stein & Reissman) in its Italian version (by Casari & Fantino, modified) has been used to evaluate family burden in relatives of chronic patients with cancer, chronic patients with other internistic pathology and acute patients. The aims of the study were to evaluate validity and reliability of the Impat and to compare family burden and anxoius/depressive symptoms in the three groups of relatives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>35 relatives of cancer patients, 20 relatives of patients with chronic, non neoplastic illness and 20 relatives of acute patients were studied. 85% of relatives of cancer patients was assisted continuously by volunteers and psychiatrists with regard to their psychological problems. Impat questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were used for psychological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validity of the Impat was confirmed. Mean scores from relatives of chronic patients were higher than scores from relatives of acute patients (ANOVA, f = 38.0; df = 2,72; p < 0.0001). Test-retest analysis was satisfactory (Person's test, N = 20 r = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Both groups of relatives of chronic patients showed higher level of anxious-depressive symptoms compared to relatives of acute subjects. No differences were found between relatives of neoplastic and non neoplastic chronic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The italian version of Impat has been confirmed as a useful and simple means of evaluation of family burden in this context. Psychosocial support seems to reduce distress in relatives of cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Psichiatrica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Psichiatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Psichiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用Stein & Reissman意大利版(Casari & Fantino修改版)《家庭影响量表》(IMPAT)对慢性癌症患者、慢性合并其他内科病理患者及急性患者亲属的家庭负担进行评估。本研究的目的是评估Impat的效度和信度,并比较三组亲属的家庭负担和焦虑/抑郁症状。方法:对35例癌症患者亲属、20例慢性非肿瘤性疾病患者亲属和20例急性患者亲属进行研究。85%的癌症患者家属的心理问题得到了志愿者和精神科医生的持续帮助。采用Impat问卷、Beck抑郁量表和状态-特质焦虑量表进行心理评估。结果:验证了该方法的有效性。慢性患者亲属的平均得分高于急性患者亲属的得分(方差分析,f = 38.0;Df = 2,72;P < 0.0001)。重测分析令人满意(Person检验,N = 20 r = 0.77, p < 0.0001)。两组慢性患者的亲属比急性患者的亲属表现出更高水平的焦虑抑郁症状。肿瘤性和非肿瘤性慢性患者亲属间无差异。结论:意大利版Impat已被证实是一种有用且简单的家庭负担评估方法。社会心理支持似乎可以减轻癌症患者家属的痛苦。
[The family burden in chronic diseases. The study of validity and reproducibility of the questionnaire on the impact of the chronic disease on the family (IMPAT)].
Objective: The "Questionario sull'Impatto della Malattia Cronica sulla Famiglia" (IMPAT) ("Impact-on-Family Scale", by Stein & Reissman) in its Italian version (by Casari & Fantino, modified) has been used to evaluate family burden in relatives of chronic patients with cancer, chronic patients with other internistic pathology and acute patients. The aims of the study were to evaluate validity and reliability of the Impat and to compare family burden and anxoius/depressive symptoms in the three groups of relatives.
Method: 35 relatives of cancer patients, 20 relatives of patients with chronic, non neoplastic illness and 20 relatives of acute patients were studied. 85% of relatives of cancer patients was assisted continuously by volunteers and psychiatrists with regard to their psychological problems. Impat questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were used for psychological evaluation.
Results: Validity of the Impat was confirmed. Mean scores from relatives of chronic patients were higher than scores from relatives of acute patients (ANOVA, f = 38.0; df = 2,72; p < 0.0001). Test-retest analysis was satisfactory (Person's test, N = 20 r = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Both groups of relatives of chronic patients showed higher level of anxious-depressive symptoms compared to relatives of acute subjects. No differences were found between relatives of neoplastic and non neoplastic chronic patients.
Conclusions: The italian version of Impat has been confirmed as a useful and simple means of evaluation of family burden in this context. Psychosocial support seems to reduce distress in relatives of cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
The journal Minerva Psichiatrica publishes scientific papers on psychiatry, psycology and psycopharmacology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.