公共卫生服务中的职业医学——继续教育研讨会评价结果

U Stössel, F Hofmann, G Reschauer, M Michaelis
{"title":"公共卫生服务中的职业医学——继续教育研讨会评价结果","authors":"U Stössel,&nbsp;F Hofmann,&nbsp;G Reschauer,&nbsp;M Michaelis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The demand for a quality controlled and quality proved continuing medical education (CME) has grown in the past. Especially the German \"Bundesärztekammer\" (society of physicians of Germany) has developed new models for CME and it's evaluation. This paper presents the background, methodology and results of two evaluations of CME for occupational physicians in health care institutions. The two symposia in 1994 and 1995 were evaluated using the same questionnaire. The comparative analysis of the results indicates the feasibility of the instrument and the validity of the results when used together with the results on an open discussion at the end of the symposium. It also demonstrates the value of the evaluation for future planning of comparable programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Occupational medicine in public health service--evaluation results of an continuing education symposium].\",\"authors\":\"U Stössel,&nbsp;F Hofmann,&nbsp;G Reschauer,&nbsp;M Michaelis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The demand for a quality controlled and quality proved continuing medical education (CME) has grown in the past. Especially the German \\\"Bundesärztekammer\\\" (society of physicians of Germany) has developed new models for CME and it's evaluation. This paper presents the background, methodology and results of two evaluations of CME for occupational physicians in health care institutions. The two symposia in 1994 and 1995 were evaluated using the same questionnaire. The comparative analysis of the results indicates the feasibility of the instrument and the validity of the results when used together with the results on an open discussion at the end of the symposium. It also demonstrates the value of the evaluation for future planning of comparable programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对质量控制和质量证明的继续医学教育(CME)的需求在过去已经增长。特别是德国“Bundesärztekammer”(德国医师协会)开发了新的CME模式及其评价。本文介绍了卫生保健机构职业医师继续教育的背景、方法和结果。1994年和1995年的两次专题讨论会使用相同的问卷进行评估。结果的对比分析表明了仪器的可行性和结果与研讨会结束时公开讨论的结果一起使用时的有效性。这也证明了评估对未来类似项目规划的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Occupational medicine in public health service--evaluation results of an continuing education symposium].

The demand for a quality controlled and quality proved continuing medical education (CME) has grown in the past. Especially the German "Bundesärztekammer" (society of physicians of Germany) has developed new models for CME and it's evaluation. This paper presents the background, methodology and results of two evaluations of CME for occupational physicians in health care institutions. The two symposia in 1994 and 1995 were evaluated using the same questionnaire. The comparative analysis of the results indicates the feasibility of the instrument and the validity of the results when used together with the results on an open discussion at the end of the symposium. It also demonstrates the value of the evaluation for future planning of comparable programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信