[被吊销驾驶权——钝器?]

Blutalkohol Pub Date : 1995-11-01

H J Bode

{"title":"[被吊销驾驶权——钝器?]","authors":"H J Bode","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like to complete and correct the article by Zabel in Blutalkohol XXXII (1995), 254 ff. by adding that the driving ban after speeding offences does not lead to a reduced risk of relapse. Furthermore, the standard federal list of offences punishable by fines is also valid in the Free State of Bavaria, and the principle of in dubio pro securitate is unknown in the German criminal law.","PeriodicalId":77045,"journal":{"name":"Blutalkohol","volume":"32 6","pages":"314-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Revoked driving right--a blunt weapon?].\",\"authors\":\"H J Bode\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I would like to complete and correct the article by Zabel in Blutalkohol XXXII (1995), 254 ff. by adding that the driving ban after speeding offences does not lead to a reduced risk of relapse. Furthermore, the standard federal list of offences punishable by fines is also valid in the Free State of Bavaria, and the principle of in dubio pro securitate is unknown in the German criminal law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blutalkohol\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"314-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blutalkohol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blutalkohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我想完善和更正Zabel在Blutalkohol XXXII (1995)， 254 ff中的文章。他补充说，超速驾驶后的驾驶禁令并不会降低再犯的风险。此外，可处以罚款的标准联邦罪行清单在巴伐利亚自由州也是有效的，而在德国刑法中不知道是否安全的原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

[Revoked driving right--a blunt weapon?].

I would like to complete and correct the article by Zabel in Blutalkohol XXXII (1995), 254 ff. by adding that the driving ban after speeding offences does not lead to a reduced risk of relapse. Furthermore, the standard federal list of offences punishable by fines is also valid in the Free State of Bavaria, and the principle of in dubio pro securitate is unknown in the German criminal law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Blutalkohol

自引率

0.00%

发文量