[在非自愿收容方案下入院的患者群体中限制措施的回顾性研究]。

Acta psychiatrica Belgica Pub Date : 1995-07-01
F Dumont, M Schittecatte, G Deleu, J Wilmotte
{"title":"[在非自愿收容方案下入院的患者群体中限制措施的回顾性研究]。","authors":"F Dumont,&nbsp;M Schittecatte,&nbsp;G Deleu,&nbsp;J Wilmotte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The application of the 06-26-1990 law for the protection of mentally ill persons has confronted the psychiatrists working in general psychiatry wards with the problem of keeping up patients hospitalized against their own will and following a judiciary authority decision. Having to deal with this problem, the authors first reviewed the literature about the use of restraint techniques in psychiatry. They observed that these universally used techniques were strikingly denied in the psychiatric literature so that their accurate application was made difficult because of the lack of information about their indications, contra-indications and application modalities. Afterwards, the authors have compared the different restraint techniques in a retrospective study over a one year period among voluntarily hospitalized patients and patients admitted against their wil in application of the 06-26-1990 law. They reported that the application of the law undoubtedly increased the number of restraint but did not modify either the population characteristics of the treatment modalities. These results have to be further confirmed in a prospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":75415,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","volume":"95 4-5","pages":"246-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Retrospective study of restraining measures in a population of patients admitted under a regimen of involuntary commitment].\",\"authors\":\"F Dumont,&nbsp;M Schittecatte,&nbsp;G Deleu,&nbsp;J Wilmotte\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The application of the 06-26-1990 law for the protection of mentally ill persons has confronted the psychiatrists working in general psychiatry wards with the problem of keeping up patients hospitalized against their own will and following a judiciary authority decision. Having to deal with this problem, the authors first reviewed the literature about the use of restraint techniques in psychiatry. They observed that these universally used techniques were strikingly denied in the psychiatric literature so that their accurate application was made difficult because of the lack of information about their indications, contra-indications and application modalities. Afterwards, the authors have compared the different restraint techniques in a retrospective study over a one year period among voluntarily hospitalized patients and patients admitted against their wil in application of the 06-26-1990 law. They reported that the application of the law undoubtedly increased the number of restraint but did not modify either the population characteristics of the treatment modalities. These results have to be further confirmed in a prospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"95 4-5\",\"pages\":\"246-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《1990年6月26日保护精神病患者法》的实施使在普通精神病病房工作的精神科医生面临一个问题,即病人违背自己的意愿并按照司法当局的决定继续住院。为了解决这个问题,作者首先回顾了关于在精神病学中使用约束技术的文献。他们观察到,这些普遍使用的技术在精神病学文献中被明显否认,因此由于缺乏有关其适应症、禁忌症和应用方式的信息,它们的准确应用变得困难。随后,作者在一项为期一年的回顾性研究中比较了自愿住院的患者和非自愿住院的患者在适用06-26-1990法律的情况下的不同约束技术。他们报告说,法律的适用无疑增加了限制的次数,但并没有改变治疗方式的人口特征。这些结果需要在前瞻性研究中进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Retrospective study of restraining measures in a population of patients admitted under a regimen of involuntary commitment].

The application of the 06-26-1990 law for the protection of mentally ill persons has confronted the psychiatrists working in general psychiatry wards with the problem of keeping up patients hospitalized against their own will and following a judiciary authority decision. Having to deal with this problem, the authors first reviewed the literature about the use of restraint techniques in psychiatry. They observed that these universally used techniques were strikingly denied in the psychiatric literature so that their accurate application was made difficult because of the lack of information about their indications, contra-indications and application modalities. Afterwards, the authors have compared the different restraint techniques in a retrospective study over a one year period among voluntarily hospitalized patients and patients admitted against their wil in application of the 06-26-1990 law. They reported that the application of the law undoubtedly increased the number of restraint but did not modify either the population characteristics of the treatment modalities. These results have to be further confirmed in a prospective study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信