[吊销驾驶执照、评估驾驶能力、再教育和酒精犯罪治疗:必要的重新定向方法]。

Blutalkohol Pub Date : 1993-03-01
A Müller
{"title":"[吊销驾驶执照、评估驾驶能力、再教育和酒精犯罪治疗:必要的重新定向方法]。","authors":"A Müller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After representing figures and facts about drinking behaviour and drinking-driving offences of the 45 mio. drivers in Germany counter-measures for DWI-offenders are dealt with. The proceedings practised so far are critically analysed and new approaches are discussed. Primarily reviewed are special preventive measures and here particularly the selection procedure usually applied in Germany, in which on demand of the driver licensing authorities the question is to be answered by expert opinions whether there is to be reckoned with driving under the influence in die future, too. It is pointed out that the expert opinions are not valid enough for making a distinct decision in an individual case. Validity coefficients obtained in evaluation studies lie between phi = 0 and .28, raising the expectancy value of 50% resulting by chance at best only on to 65%. Moreover the psychological interview is understandably burdened with faked answers of the explored person, in several cases increased by a specific, professionally managed preparation for the testing situation. As a way out of the dilemma expert opinions prognosticating driver behaviour should be waived in favour of making diagnoses and proposals for treatment. The timing of regranting the driver license is then only determined by the revocation period pronounced by the court and by the performance of the measures recommended by the experts and demanded by the licensing authority. As a support for such a procedure a more consistent and resolute administration of the judicial revocation of driver license with longer periods for repeaters should be provided. Besides there is necessary a wider range of rehabilitation programs for drivers with alcoholic problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":77045,"journal":{"name":"Blutalkohol","volume":"30 2","pages":"65-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Revoking the driver's license, assessment of driver competence, re-education and therapy in alcohol offenses: approaches to a necessary reorientation].\",\"authors\":\"A Müller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After representing figures and facts about drinking behaviour and drinking-driving offences of the 45 mio. drivers in Germany counter-measures for DWI-offenders are dealt with. The proceedings practised so far are critically analysed and new approaches are discussed. Primarily reviewed are special preventive measures and here particularly the selection procedure usually applied in Germany, in which on demand of the driver licensing authorities the question is to be answered by expert opinions whether there is to be reckoned with driving under the influence in die future, too. It is pointed out that the expert opinions are not valid enough for making a distinct decision in an individual case. Validity coefficients obtained in evaluation studies lie between phi = 0 and .28, raising the expectancy value of 50% resulting by chance at best only on to 65%. Moreover the psychological interview is understandably burdened with faked answers of the explored person, in several cases increased by a specific, professionally managed preparation for the testing situation. As a way out of the dilemma expert opinions prognosticating driver behaviour should be waived in favour of making diagnoses and proposals for treatment. The timing of regranting the driver license is then only determined by the revocation period pronounced by the court and by the performance of the measures recommended by the experts and demanded by the licensing authority. As a support for such a procedure a more consistent and resolute administration of the judicial revocation of driver license with longer periods for repeaters should be provided. Besides there is necessary a wider range of rehabilitation programs for drivers with alcoholic problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blutalkohol\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"65-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blutalkohol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blutalkohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在陈述了4500万的饮酒行为和酒驾违法的数据和事实之后。在德国,针对酒后驾车违规者的反措施被处理。到目前为止,实践的程序进行了批判性的分析,并讨论了新的方法。主要审查的是特别预防措施,特别是在德国通常适用的选择程序,根据驾驶执照当局的要求,问题是由专家意见回答,将来是否也要考虑酒后驾驶。指出专家意见不足以在个案中作出明确的决定。评估研究中获得的效度系数介于phi = 0和0.28之间,将50%的偶然结果的期望值至多提高到65%。此外,可以理解的是,心理面试中充满了被调查者的虚假回答,在某些情况下,由于对测试情况进行了专门的、专业的准备,这种情况会增加。为了摆脱这种困境,应该放弃专家的意见来预测司机的行为,而倾向于做出诊断和提出治疗建议。然后,重新颁发驾驶执照的时间只取决于法院宣布的撤销期限,以及专家建议和许可当局要求的措施的执行情况。作为对这一程序的支持,应当对司法撤销驾驶执照给予更一致和更坚决的管理,并延长吊销驾驶执照的期限。此外,有必要为有酗酒问题的司机提供更广泛的康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Revoking the driver's license, assessment of driver competence, re-education and therapy in alcohol offenses: approaches to a necessary reorientation].

After representing figures and facts about drinking behaviour and drinking-driving offences of the 45 mio. drivers in Germany counter-measures for DWI-offenders are dealt with. The proceedings practised so far are critically analysed and new approaches are discussed. Primarily reviewed are special preventive measures and here particularly the selection procedure usually applied in Germany, in which on demand of the driver licensing authorities the question is to be answered by expert opinions whether there is to be reckoned with driving under the influence in die future, too. It is pointed out that the expert opinions are not valid enough for making a distinct decision in an individual case. Validity coefficients obtained in evaluation studies lie between phi = 0 and .28, raising the expectancy value of 50% resulting by chance at best only on to 65%. Moreover the psychological interview is understandably burdened with faked answers of the explored person, in several cases increased by a specific, professionally managed preparation for the testing situation. As a way out of the dilemma expert opinions prognosticating driver behaviour should be waived in favour of making diagnoses and proposals for treatment. The timing of regranting the driver license is then only determined by the revocation period pronounced by the court and by the performance of the measures recommended by the experts and demanded by the licensing authority. As a support for such a procedure a more consistent and resolute administration of the judicial revocation of driver license with longer periods for repeaters should be provided. Besides there is necessary a wider range of rehabilitation programs for drivers with alcoholic problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信