裂隙封闭与裂隙修复的5年存活率。

P Städtler
{"title":"裂隙封闭与裂隙修复的5年存活率。","authors":"P Städtler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five hundred and thirty-four sealants and fissure restorations were checked up over a period of five years. The survival rate within five to six years amounted to 94.3% and 77.2% in relation to total and partial loss, respectively. It was significantly lower with molars than with premolars. No significant difference was found between sealants and fissure restorations nor with applications in the upper and lower jaws. Sealants and fissure restorations seem to be recommendable for the prevention as well as for conservative treatment of initial defects because more substance of the tooth is preserved than with conventional filling methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 7","pages":"361-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five-year survival rate of fissure sealings and fissure restorations.\",\"authors\":\"P Städtler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Five hundred and thirty-four sealants and fissure restorations were checked up over a period of five years. The survival rate within five to six years amounted to 94.3% and 77.2% in relation to total and partial loss, respectively. It was significantly lower with molars than with premolars. No significant difference was found between sealants and fissure restorations nor with applications in the upper and lower jaws. Sealants and fissure restorations seem to be recommendable for the prevention as well as for conservative treatment of initial defects because more substance of the tooth is preserved than with conventional filling methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"361-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在五年的时间里,对534种密封剂和裂缝修复进行了检查。5 ~ 6年生存率为94.3%,部分损失为77.2%。磨牙比前磨牙明显更低。在上颚和下颚的应用中,没有发现密封剂和裂缝修复之间的显著差异。对于预防和保守治疗最初的缺陷,密封剂和裂缝修复似乎是值得推荐的,因为与传统的填充方法相比,保留了更多的牙齿物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Five-year survival rate of fissure sealings and fissure restorations.

Five hundred and thirty-four sealants and fissure restorations were checked up over a period of five years. The survival rate within five to six years amounted to 94.3% and 77.2% in relation to total and partial loss, respectively. It was significantly lower with molars than with premolars. No significant difference was found between sealants and fissure restorations nor with applications in the upper and lower jaws. Sealants and fissure restorations seem to be recommendable for the prevention as well as for conservative treatment of initial defects because more substance of the tooth is preserved than with conventional filling methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信